The recent flurry of actions and statements from Donald Trump’s administration illustrates a recurring pattern of authoritarian overreach, performative governance, and politicized policymaking. A Truth Social post about a call with Vladimir Putin revealed a dangerously casual approach to diplomacy, equating Ukraine's self-defense with Russian aggression while promoting Putin as a potential partner on Iran’s nuclear issue—an idea both naïve and geopolitically incoherent. This disregard for international norms continued in a White House memorandum accusing President Biden’s aides of unlawfully governing through autopen signatures—claims based on insinuation rather than legal evidence, weaponizing executive oversight for political retaliation.

Trump's proclamations on immigration further reflected an ideology of exclusion wrapped in national security rhetoric. One sweeping order revived Trump-era travel bans with thinly substantiated justifications, reinforcing xenophobic narratives and ideological screening that blurred the line between safety and prejudice. Another proclamation targeted Harvard University, accusing it of harboring foreign threats, linking its academic practices to national security violations without due evidence. This unprecedented use of immigration law to penalize an individual institution demonstrated a chilling willingness to politicize higher education.

Trump’s public appearances mirrored these trends. At a White House “Summer Soirée,” he delivered an ad-libbed campaign-style monologue filled with dubious statistics and self-congratulatory anecdotes, treating complex issues like inflation and foreign policy as punchlines. Similarly, at a gala event, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President J.D. Vance repackaged old failures as new populism, attacking elites and universities with conspiratorial rhetoric while glossing over their own policy complicity.

Meanwhile, courts have pushed back against Trump’s executive overreach. A federal judge ruled that migrants deported to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act were denied due process, mandating habeas relief. Another judge ordered the return of a wrongfully deported asylum seeker from Guatemala, exposing procedural violations. Additionally, a ruling halted Trump’s attempt to dismantle the Job Corps, criticizing the administration’s disregard for congressional authority. Civil rights enforcement also appeared selectively applied, with the administration targeting Columbia University for alleged anti-Semitism in a move that conflated student activism with unlawful discrimination.

Together, these developments paint a picture of an administration increasingly detached from legal norms and institutional restraint, favoring spectacle, loyalty tests, and punitive governance over coherent policy, rule of law, or democratic accountability.

Click here for a full transcript and source links.

Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe