Donald Trump’s activities revealed a pattern of erratic leadership, performative diplomacy, and ideological policymaking. A Truth Social post about Trump’s call with Chinese President Xi Jinping exemplified vague and self-congratulatory diplomacy lacking substantive details, especially regarding rare earth trade agreements. Instead of outlining concrete outcomes, Trump leaned on platitudes and media theatrics, emphasizing Wall Street-aligned representatives and avoiding broader security issues with China. In a separate post, Trump mischaracterized a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report on tariffs, framing projected deficit reductions as unqualified wins while ignoring warnings of economic contraction and inflation. His attacks on the nonpartisan CBO further revealed a preference for narrative control over fact-based governance.

Additional posts reflected a blend of personal vendetta and policy manipulation, particularly targeting Elon Musk. Trump framed the reversal of electric vehicle mandates and termination of government contracts as retaliatory acts, not policy decisions grounded in public interest. He exaggerated legislative victories and predicted a fantastical “68% tax increase” if his bill failed, revealing an unstable fusion of ego, grievance, and misinformation.

Trump’s bilateral meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz further showcased this dynamic, as the conversation devolved into off-topic monologues and domestic grievances, overshadowing diplomatic dialogue. His remarks on Ukraine were insensitive and lacking in strategic direction, while his tangents on Musk, university politics, and presidential autopens undercut the seriousness of international engagement. The Chancellor remained composed and policy-focused, but Trump’s chaotic approach undermined the purpose of the meeting.

A roundtable with the Fraternal Order of Police mirrored campaign theatrics, with Trump proclaiming exaggerated achievements and portraying himself as the ultimate pro-police president. Substantive concerns like recruitment and mental health were buried under partisan rhetoric and attacks on oversight mechanisms. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FOP leaders reinforced the administration’s dismissive stance toward institutional accountability, and some speeches veered into rhetoric that undermined the judiciary.

The administration also imposed sanctions on four International Criminal Court judges over investigations into U.S. and Israeli actions, a move condemned by the ICC and human rights groups as an attack on judicial independence. The action aligned with Trump’s broader hostility toward international legal frameworks and was framed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio as a response to a politicized institution.

Finally, Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s Senate testimony revealed the Trump administration’s intent to dismantle the Department of Education through funding cuts, program eliminations, and bureaucratic hollowing. Her defense of budget proposals was marked by evasions and a lack of basic oversight knowledge, particularly regarding TRIO and GEAR UP programs, mental health grants, and civil rights enforcement. Bipartisan criticism highlighted concerns about transparency, legal compliance, and the targeting of ideological opponents on college campuses. McMahon’s vague responses and absence of impact analysis confirmed fears that the administration’s education policy is ideologically driven and aimed at gutting federal involvement in public schooling.

Click here for a complete transcript and source links.

Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe