While State-owned power utility Eskom is in the process of undergoing major structural changes and making strides to play its part in South Africa’s decarbonisation, some stakeholders believe there is more to be done before a just energy transition can be realised.

From a regulatory and policy perspective, Eskom CEO Andre de Ruyter deemed it prudent that government create policy alignment and complementarity between four major policy streams – energy, fiscal, industrial and environmental.

De Ruyter told Engineering News in an interview ahead of a webinar hosted by Creamer Media on February 2, that if South Africa had a more integrated policy approach, stakeholders would be better able to attract investors for projects. That would, in turn, encourage increased local manufacturing and create more jobs.

He said integrated policies would help to address energy security challenges, as well as pave the way for an open electricity market.

“With smart policies, we can also drive additional local content manufacturing, and have a targeted, strategic approach to it, instead of a brute force percentage requirement for project developers,” he explained, adding that government would do well to focus its efforts on giving certainty of demand for longer periods, as well as supporting supply chain development.

For example, De Ruyter highlighted how demand for electric vehicles was not growing at the pace that it could in South Africa, owing to high import duties, which impacted on investment. However, by allowing demand to grow and initially being satisfied by imports, it would, over time, result in a response from the manufacturing industry and drive higher local content.

Meanwhile, global consultancy EY-Parthenon executive director Paul O’Flaherty, who was the facilitator of Creamer Media’s webinar, titled ‘Advancing the Just Transition’, mentioned that South Africa had 18 000 MW of shovel-ready projects, just waiting for investment.

He asked the webinar participants – mining company Impala Platinum sustainable developments executive Tsakani Mthombeni and energy developer Mainstream Renewable Power Africa GM Hein Reyneke – what would attract more investment in the energy sector.

Mthombeni suggested a “one-stop-shop” entity that the mining industry, for one, could approach to conduct the necessary processes and administration to facilitate power projects, or officiate and effect wheeling agreements.

He pointed out that companies eager to build power projects or enter into wheeling agreements often had to visit multiple government offices as part of the process, which was onerous, confusing and costly.

In particular, he said, wheeling through the grid must be simplified.

Mthombeni also mentioned that the cost of energy storage technology and prevailing high electricity tariffs – and uncertainty about further increases – were also major factors for mining companies considering building renewable energy generation projects.

Electricity accounts for about 40% of a mining and processing operation’s input costs, and if the South African government delays addressing the issue, it could risk mining companies diverting their processing capabilities elsewhere, he noted.

Further, Mthombeni believed the unbundling of Eskom into three legal entities was a step in the right direction, as it would provide a more streamlined approach to administration and processes around transmission.

“Mining companies are willing and able to enter into power network partnerships, but it remains unclear whether it is possible and if the grid can come on board.”

He noted that about 5 GW of capacity could be added to the grid by mining companies alone.

Reyneke, in turn, mentioned the challenge the renewable industry had with local content and government’s changing requirements around it. Traditionally, it has been percentage-based.

For example, the local content requirement was 50% for solar projects and 40% for wind projects in Bid Window 5 of the Renewable Energy Indepe...