03.10.2018 - By Joe Miller and Christian Turner
What is the legal precedent following a decision of the Supreme Court that lacks a majority opinion? For a few decades, the meta-rule has been that such as case stands for the position of those justices "who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds." Or has it? And could it? Richard Re joins us to discuss the problems of the Marks rule, the meaning of precedent, and ultimately the nature of our law. This problem will be confronted in the Supreme Court in the coming weeks.
This show’s links:
Richard Re’s faculty profile and academic writing
Re's Judicata
Richard Re, Beyond the Marks Rule
Adam Steinman, Non-Majority Opinions and Biconditional Rules
Marks v. United States
SCOTUSblog page for Hughes v. United States
Richard's amicus brief in Hughes
Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.: the 1961 decision and the 1964 decision
Justice Lewis Powell's papers on Marks from the The Lewis Powell Supreme Court Case Files at Washington and Lee University School of Law
Special Guest: Richard Re.