In this episode of Snakz Thoughts, we examine how power—not principle—often determines which actions are labeled “aggression” and which are framed as “security.” Using Greenland, Taiwan, and Ukraine as case studies, this episode explores why global rules appear consistent in language but flexible in practice. We look at how great powers justify territorial interest, strategic influence, and intervention—while condemning similar actions by rivals. This is not an episode about choosing sides. It’s about understanding how power explains itself, how narratives are formed, and why citizens are often left arguing morality while decisions are driven by interests. This discussion is grounded in realism, history, and philosophy—designed to help listeners think more clearly about sovereignty, geopolitics, and modern power dynamics. Snakz Thoughts focuses on systems, not slogans.