Recent times have seen growing criticism of the Supreme Court's legitimacy, with some claiming that the Supreme Court has amassed too much governmental and political power. Such critics have proposed judicial reform to even out this perceived imbalance, suggesting changes like term limits for justices and a binding code of ethics. Opponents say, however, that these changes could undermine the authority of the Supreme Court and upset the delicate system of checks and balances between the branches of government put in place by our Constitution. These debates have led to increased polarization within the legal profession. What is the real purpose and importance of preserving an independent judiciary? How can one engage with the Court's decisions without undermining its authority? Can we champion the integrity of the Court while fostering respectful and constructive dialogue within the legal community?
Featuring:

Prof. Daniel Epps, Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Louis
Hon. Edith H. Jones, Judge, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mr. Kannon K. Shanmugam, Partner, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Prof. Stephen I. Vladeck, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
Moderator: Hon. James C. Ho, Judge, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit