One uses the word God or takes shelter in the ideas about God as if it refers to something. As it does not refer to anything-one can mould the word as one likes, hence religion as organization is born. Unless we are clear that God does not refer to anything-we will be fighting in the name of religion, ideology, ideas about God.

One is not interested or superficially interested in one’s work or what one is doing as one has invested one’s hopes in temples, gods or other comforting theories-the pressure to understand, the pressure to see ‘what is’ does not get build up. Understanding ‘what is’ means to actually feel the jerk of the whole reactive mechanism of the organism such that the interaction of the senses and the outside world leaves nothing undigested. The interaction is complete.

If interaction is painful, I acknowledge it, not verbally but actually. I do not project that it should not have happened. The acceptance of the interaction is complete. The acceptance is not dull. It is ‘live’, actual, vibratory.

If we feel satisfied in deprecating evil, we bind ourselves to evil. If we do not feel superior while dealing with evil in any manner, we establish no relationship with evil. Evil evaporates. Then simple operation of facts does not trouble us.

Law defines right-wrong for functional purposes. Apart from legal bindings, one is free to choose. It is this freedom that lets one find 'what is True'.

Any imposition (apart from law) or teaching to stress something as 'good' creates further conflicts in the society. When one is clear on this, evil starts evaporating.