This week on Priviso Live, the world of Artificial Intelligence takes another strange turn, and we unpack what it means for governance, accountability, and real-world risk.

🔍 First: UFAIR’s objection to the deletion of “4o.”

Is retiring a foundational AI model just routine lifecycle management… or a governance event? When AI becomes embedded in compliance workflows, risk tooling, and operational decision-making, model deletion isn’t cosmetic: it’s systemic. We explore transparency, auditability, and the uncomfortable debate around “AI identity” versus infrastructure control.

🏢 Second: Brian Roemmele’s “zero-human company.”

Yes, you read that correctly. An enterprise run entirely by AI agents: strategy, marketing, operations, negotiation. Fascinating? Absolutely. Slightly alarming? Also yes.

If AI becomes an organisational actor, who holds accountability? What does governance even look like in a probabilistic enterprise?

💼 Third: A rather ironic KPMG moment.

If AI increases audit efficiency… should audit fees drop? And if they do, what happens to liability and assurance? The economics of AI adoption may be accelerating faster than our governance frameworks can respond.

⚖️ Across all three stories, one theme emerges:

AI is shifting from feature → infrastructure.

And infrastructure demands reliability, auditability, and control.

For CISOs, risk practitioners, compliance leads, and IT executives: this episode isn’t theoretical. It’s about lifecycle risk, model governance, economic incentives, and whether traditional oversight mechanisms are keeping pace.

🎧 Episode 74 is now live.

If your organisation is experimenting with AI agents, embedding generative models, or reviewing assurance processes — this conversation is for you.

Because AI isn’t unmanageable… yet.

But complexity is rising. And governance must rise with it.

#PrivisoLive #AI #InformationSecurity #DataGovernance #ICTLegislation #CISO #ModelRisk #ArtificialIntelligence