The two sources present opposing arguments about the Export-Import Bank (EXIM) of the United States. The first source argues that EXIM should be abolished, claiming that it is a protectionist agency that wastes taxpayer money, doesn't promote economic growth, and doesn't effectively help small businesses. The second source advocates for EXIM's continued existence, arguing that it is crucial for American companies to compete in the global market, especially against China's aggressive export credit practices. Both sources rely on data and examples to support their claims, making the case for or against EXIM's effectiveness and necessity.