
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
It is a prevailing custom on Rosh HaShanah that we start the new year eating certain foods. This falls into the realm of custom, as it is not mandated by the Torah or the Sages. Ashkenazim have the popular custom of eating apples and honey, codified by the Rema. Sephardim have an elaborate array of foods often including gourds, leeks, beets, and dates. Without losing site of the core mitzvot associated with Rosh HaShanah such as listening to the Shofar and engaging in Teshuva, what is the idea behind beginning the year with certain foods?
ת"ר אין מושחים את המלכים אלא על המעיין כדי שתמשך מלכותם שנא' (מלכים א א) ויאמר המלך להם קחו עמכם את עבדי אדוניכם [וגו'] והורדתם אותו אל גיחון (תלמוד בבלי - מסכת הוריות - דף יב,א)
There are a number of questions that we must take into consideration to understand this enigmatic Gemara:
Q1: What is the idea of anointing a king by a flowing spring? What does this activity have to do with a lasting kingdom
Q2: What is the basis for רבי אמי’s odd suggestions?
Q2b: When each possibility is described, why doesn’t the text explicitly mention the negative in each case? (i.e. if the chicken dies…or ואי לא)
Q3a: What does the Gemara mean by ולאו מלתא היא –it’s not a thing?
Q3b: What is the meaning of חלשא דעתיה ומיתרע מזליה –lest his psyche weaken, and his fate will deteriorate? Do we really believe in bad luck?
Q4: What is אביי suggestion and conclusion? I thought the Gemara said “signs are not a thing”. How does he then make a converse conclusion? How does אביי’s approach differ from רבי אמי’s?
כשמושחין את המלך היו מושחין אותו על המעין לסימן טוב שתמשך מלכותו ולא דרך נחש חלילה אלא לעוררו שיתנהג בדרך מעיין אשר לא יכזבו מימיו ולא יתנהג בדרך שיהיה ענינו כאפיק נחלים העובר לשעתו (בית הבחירה –מאירי– מסכת הוריות דף יב עמוד א)
The Torah and our Sages are sensitive to our psyche and our subconscious associations. At this critical time of year, as with other critical points in time such as the inauguration of a new king, we take these associations into consideration. Rebbe Ami suggested a series of associations that may assist a person in remaining positive in times of need (A2), but the suggested actions also have a risk of backfiring and creating a harmful negative association with potentially destructive consequences (A3). The Talmud therefore rejects these actions, and an alternative approach is suggested by Abaye. When Abaye says, “Now that you’ve said signs are a thing,” he means now that we see that our psyche is sensitive, and that negative associations can be harmful, here is an another approach.
Anointing a Jewish king next to a flowing spring, as interpreted by the Meiri, is designed to prompt him to think about his actions in a broader context. Small streams come and go, and his kingship may have a similar fate. But if he operates with consistency, and acts with the long-term in mind, he will have an opportunity to leave a lasting legacy (A1).
The time around Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur can be daunting. We are held to account for our day-to-day actions, which we often give too little attention. Scrupulous investigation into our day-to-day actions, which is encouraged during this time, is extremely challenging. The Torah and our Sages were sensitive to this, and a discussion unfolds in the Talmud about how to support a positive and resilient attitude towards the Teshuva process. Rebbe Ami suggested a possible approach which may have resulted in a positive association necessary for success, but also risked backfiring and undermining the objective. The Talmud rejects his suggestion. Abaye suggested our current custom, which is to have fruits and vegetables on the table. As the Meiri points out, we make certain statements alongside this presentation to prompt us to do Teshuva and improve our actions. While there is no risk of a negative association here (A4), the Meiri notes a potential risk of misinterpreting these actions to be superstitious and violate the biblical prohibition against נחוש. He reminds us that words have no independent power. It is up to us to interpret these visual aids properly, which serve as reminders for us to engage in Teshuva.
It is a prevailing custom on Rosh HaShanah that we start the new year eating certain foods. This falls into the realm of custom, as it is not mandated by the Torah or the Sages. Ashkenazim have the popular custom of eating apples and honey, codified by the Rema. Sephardim have an elaborate array of foods often including gourds, leeks, beets, and dates. Without losing site of the core mitzvot associated with Rosh HaShanah such as listening to the Shofar and engaging in Teshuva, what is the idea behind beginning the year with certain foods?
ת"ר אין מושחים את המלכים אלא על המעיין כדי שתמשך מלכותם שנא' (מלכים א א) ויאמר המלך להם קחו עמכם את עבדי אדוניכם [וגו'] והורדתם אותו אל גיחון (תלמוד בבלי - מסכת הוריות - דף יב,א)
There are a number of questions that we must take into consideration to understand this enigmatic Gemara:
Q1: What is the idea of anointing a king by a flowing spring? What does this activity have to do with a lasting kingdom
Q2: What is the basis for רבי אמי’s odd suggestions?
Q2b: When each possibility is described, why doesn’t the text explicitly mention the negative in each case? (i.e. if the chicken dies…or ואי לא)
Q3a: What does the Gemara mean by ולאו מלתא היא –it’s not a thing?
Q3b: What is the meaning of חלשא דעתיה ומיתרע מזליה –lest his psyche weaken, and his fate will deteriorate? Do we really believe in bad luck?
Q4: What is אביי suggestion and conclusion? I thought the Gemara said “signs are not a thing”. How does he then make a converse conclusion? How does אביי’s approach differ from רבי אמי’s?
כשמושחין את המלך היו מושחין אותו על המעין לסימן טוב שתמשך מלכותו ולא דרך נחש חלילה אלא לעוררו שיתנהג בדרך מעיין אשר לא יכזבו מימיו ולא יתנהג בדרך שיהיה ענינו כאפיק נחלים העובר לשעתו (בית הבחירה –מאירי– מסכת הוריות דף יב עמוד א)
The Torah and our Sages are sensitive to our psyche and our subconscious associations. At this critical time of year, as with other critical points in time such as the inauguration of a new king, we take these associations into consideration. Rebbe Ami suggested a series of associations that may assist a person in remaining positive in times of need (A2), but the suggested actions also have a risk of backfiring and creating a harmful negative association with potentially destructive consequences (A3). The Talmud therefore rejects these actions, and an alternative approach is suggested by Abaye. When Abaye says, “Now that you’ve said signs are a thing,” he means now that we see that our psyche is sensitive, and that negative associations can be harmful, here is an another approach.
Anointing a Jewish king next to a flowing spring, as interpreted by the Meiri, is designed to prompt him to think about his actions in a broader context. Small streams come and go, and his kingship may have a similar fate. But if he operates with consistency, and acts with the long-term in mind, he will have an opportunity to leave a lasting legacy (A1).
The time around Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur can be daunting. We are held to account for our day-to-day actions, which we often give too little attention. Scrupulous investigation into our day-to-day actions, which is encouraged during this time, is extremely challenging. The Torah and our Sages were sensitive to this, and a discussion unfolds in the Talmud about how to support a positive and resilient attitude towards the Teshuva process. Rebbe Ami suggested a possible approach which may have resulted in a positive association necessary for success, but also risked backfiring and undermining the objective. The Talmud rejects his suggestion. Abaye suggested our current custom, which is to have fruits and vegetables on the table. As the Meiri points out, we make certain statements alongside this presentation to prompt us to do Teshuva and improve our actions. While there is no risk of a negative association here (A4), the Meiri notes a potential risk of misinterpreting these actions to be superstitious and violate the biblical prohibition against נחוש. He reminds us that words have no independent power. It is up to us to interpret these visual aids properly, which serve as reminders for us to engage in Teshuva.