It's official Gorsuch has been nominated to replace Scalia on the SCOTUS. The opposition of course is is railing against Gorsuch claiming that he's not impartial enough, but let me ask you a question. Are we talking about the same impartiality we see from justice Ginsberg? Or the same impartiality we see from justice justice Kagan? Here's a tip for all our sagacious and wise lawmakers. Why don't we evaluate Gorsuch not based on his personal views, but on his views on the Constitution. On his Constitutional principles - not his personality. How refreshing would that be?