
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Jeff Mains sits down with Radhika Dutt, author of Radical Product Thinking, to challenge the conventional wisdom around goal-setting, KPIs, and OKRs. Radhika reveals why chasing metrics can actually distort behavior and undermine long-term growth, introducing a powerful alternative: treating growth like a puzzle rather than a scorecard.
The conversation explores how well-intentioned targets create perverse incentives, why measures should be tools for insight rather than evaluation, and how a curiosity-driven approach—using the OHLA framework (Observe, Hypothesize, Learn, Adapt)—helps teams make smarter decisions in real-world conditions. Radhika shares compelling examples from OpenAI, maritime SaaS platforms, and robotics companies to illustrate how puzzle-solving beats goal-setting for sustainable growth.
Whether you're drowning in dashboards or hitting targets while feeling like something's off, this episode offers a refreshing lens on progress, leadership, and building momentum without the performance theater.
Key Takeaways[0:00] - Episode introduction and overview of why goal-setting may be backfiring
[4:48] - The fundamental problem with KPIs and OKRs: Goodhart's Law and Campbell's Law explained
[6:28] - Dutt's Law: "A measure is only useful as a tool for insight, not a yardstick for evaluation"
[7:16] - Real-world example: How OpenAI's user engagement targets led to dangerous "sycophantic AI"
[10:37] - The hidden dangers of hitting targets while ignoring negative indicators
[11:44] - Introduction to puzzle-setting vs. goal-setting mindset
[12:09] - The OHLA framework explained: Observe, Hypothesize, Learn, Adapt
[17:51] - Case study: Why improving filters wouldn't have solved the real problem
[28:47] - The performance theater trap: Why jumping to solutions feels comfortable but fails
[30:28] - How to get customer meetings when people say "you should already know this"
[33:00] - Why in-person observation matters more when mental models differ
[36:27] - Growth comes from matching user mental models, not forcing adoption of yours
[37:47] - The Tesla UI example: When "cool" design ignores user mental models
[37:47] - Top-down vs. bottom-up: How to introduce puzzle-solving in organizations
[39:27] - Why leaders fear losing control and how to address it
[43:01] - Vision-driven vs. iteration-led: Crafting a detailed, actionable vision statement
[45:41] - Example vision statement that tells the whole story without mentioning the product
[48:03] - Why detailed visions create ownership better than memorable slogans
[50:01] - One mindset shift founders can make this week to reduce performance theater
Tweetable QuotesStop using metrics as judgment tools. When measures become targets, they get gamed (Campbell's Law) and cease to be good measures (Goodhart's Law). Instead, use data to understand what's happening—both good and bad—rather than to prove you've hit arbitrary numbers. This shift from evaluation to insight prevents teams from hiding problems and gaming the system.
2. Replace Goals with Puzzles Using the OHLA FrameworkTransform your approach from goal-setting to puzzle-solving with OHLA: Observe (identify the problem and open questions), Hypothesize (make your first attempt), Learn (ask "how well did it work?" and "what did we learn?"), and Adapt (determine "what will we try next?"). This creates genuine curiosity, reduces performance theater, and helps teams embrace learning without the stigma of "failure."
3. Observe Before You HypothesizeResist the urge to jump straight to solutions. Spend time in the problem space, even though it's uncomfortable. The maritime SaaS example showed that improving filters (the obvious solution from data) would have done nothing for the larger market opportunity. By observing tech-averse users in other roles first, the company doubled sales two years in a row by addressing the real problem.
4. Match User Mental Models, Don't Force YoursGrowth comes from understanding how your users think and work, then building products that fit their mental models—not from forcing them to adopt yours. When mental models differ significantly (tech-averse users, different industries, non-engineers), in-person observation becomes critical. Watch them work, see what they do outside your platform, and ask questions about their actual workflow.
5. Craft Detailed, Actionable VisionsForget short, memorable slogans. A powerful vision uses a fill-in-the-blank statement that answers: Whose problem are you solving? What is the problem? Why does it need solving? What does the world look like when you're done? How will you bring it about? When team members can describe the vision in their own words (not repeat a tagline), they've internalized it and taken ownership.
6. Start Small and Build ConfidenceWhen introducing puzzle-based thinking, don't demand teams abandon OKRs immediately. Start by having product teams present progress in OHLA format while leadership still uses OKRs. As teams demonstrate competence in puzzle-solving and leaders see they gain "real control" (ears on the ground, anticipation, actionable insights), the transition becomes natural. Role model the approach by reflecting on past initiatives using the three questions.
Guest Resourceshttps://www.radicalproduct.com/toolkit/#OHLToolkit
https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhika-dutt/
Episode SponsorThe Captain's Keys
Small Fish, Big Pond – https://smallfishbigpond.com/ Use the promo code ‘SaaSFuel’
Champion Leadership Group – https://championleadership.com/
SaaS Fuel ResourcesWebsite - https://championleadership.com/
Jeff Mains on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffkmains/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/jeffkmains
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/thesaasguy/
Instagram - https://instagram.com/jeffkmains
By Jeff MainsIn this episode, Jeff Mains sits down with Radhika Dutt, author of Radical Product Thinking, to challenge the conventional wisdom around goal-setting, KPIs, and OKRs. Radhika reveals why chasing metrics can actually distort behavior and undermine long-term growth, introducing a powerful alternative: treating growth like a puzzle rather than a scorecard.
The conversation explores how well-intentioned targets create perverse incentives, why measures should be tools for insight rather than evaluation, and how a curiosity-driven approach—using the OHLA framework (Observe, Hypothesize, Learn, Adapt)—helps teams make smarter decisions in real-world conditions. Radhika shares compelling examples from OpenAI, maritime SaaS platforms, and robotics companies to illustrate how puzzle-solving beats goal-setting for sustainable growth.
Whether you're drowning in dashboards or hitting targets while feeling like something's off, this episode offers a refreshing lens on progress, leadership, and building momentum without the performance theater.
Key Takeaways[0:00] - Episode introduction and overview of why goal-setting may be backfiring
[4:48] - The fundamental problem with KPIs and OKRs: Goodhart's Law and Campbell's Law explained
[6:28] - Dutt's Law: "A measure is only useful as a tool for insight, not a yardstick for evaluation"
[7:16] - Real-world example: How OpenAI's user engagement targets led to dangerous "sycophantic AI"
[10:37] - The hidden dangers of hitting targets while ignoring negative indicators
[11:44] - Introduction to puzzle-setting vs. goal-setting mindset
[12:09] - The OHLA framework explained: Observe, Hypothesize, Learn, Adapt
[17:51] - Case study: Why improving filters wouldn't have solved the real problem
[28:47] - The performance theater trap: Why jumping to solutions feels comfortable but fails
[30:28] - How to get customer meetings when people say "you should already know this"
[33:00] - Why in-person observation matters more when mental models differ
[36:27] - Growth comes from matching user mental models, not forcing adoption of yours
[37:47] - The Tesla UI example: When "cool" design ignores user mental models
[37:47] - Top-down vs. bottom-up: How to introduce puzzle-solving in organizations
[39:27] - Why leaders fear losing control and how to address it
[43:01] - Vision-driven vs. iteration-led: Crafting a detailed, actionable vision statement
[45:41] - Example vision statement that tells the whole story without mentioning the product
[48:03] - Why detailed visions create ownership better than memorable slogans
[50:01] - One mindset shift founders can make this week to reduce performance theater
Tweetable QuotesStop using metrics as judgment tools. When measures become targets, they get gamed (Campbell's Law) and cease to be good measures (Goodhart's Law). Instead, use data to understand what's happening—both good and bad—rather than to prove you've hit arbitrary numbers. This shift from evaluation to insight prevents teams from hiding problems and gaming the system.
2. Replace Goals with Puzzles Using the OHLA FrameworkTransform your approach from goal-setting to puzzle-solving with OHLA: Observe (identify the problem and open questions), Hypothesize (make your first attempt), Learn (ask "how well did it work?" and "what did we learn?"), and Adapt (determine "what will we try next?"). This creates genuine curiosity, reduces performance theater, and helps teams embrace learning without the stigma of "failure."
3. Observe Before You HypothesizeResist the urge to jump straight to solutions. Spend time in the problem space, even though it's uncomfortable. The maritime SaaS example showed that improving filters (the obvious solution from data) would have done nothing for the larger market opportunity. By observing tech-averse users in other roles first, the company doubled sales two years in a row by addressing the real problem.
4. Match User Mental Models, Don't Force YoursGrowth comes from understanding how your users think and work, then building products that fit their mental models—not from forcing them to adopt yours. When mental models differ significantly (tech-averse users, different industries, non-engineers), in-person observation becomes critical. Watch them work, see what they do outside your platform, and ask questions about their actual workflow.
5. Craft Detailed, Actionable VisionsForget short, memorable slogans. A powerful vision uses a fill-in-the-blank statement that answers: Whose problem are you solving? What is the problem? Why does it need solving? What does the world look like when you're done? How will you bring it about? When team members can describe the vision in their own words (not repeat a tagline), they've internalized it and taken ownership.
6. Start Small and Build ConfidenceWhen introducing puzzle-based thinking, don't demand teams abandon OKRs immediately. Start by having product teams present progress in OHLA format while leadership still uses OKRs. As teams demonstrate competence in puzzle-solving and leaders see they gain "real control" (ears on the ground, anticipation, actionable insights), the transition becomes natural. Role model the approach by reflecting on past initiatives using the three questions.
Guest Resourceshttps://www.radicalproduct.com/toolkit/#OHLToolkit
https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhika-dutt/
Episode SponsorThe Captain's Keys
Small Fish, Big Pond – https://smallfishbigpond.com/ Use the promo code ‘SaaSFuel’
Champion Leadership Group – https://championleadership.com/
SaaS Fuel ResourcesWebsite - https://championleadership.com/
Jeff Mains on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffkmains/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/jeffkmains
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/thesaasguy/
Instagram - https://instagram.com/jeffkmains