Rationally Speaking Podcast

Rationally Speaking #152 - Dan Fincke on "The pros and cons of civil disagreement"

02.07.2016 - By New York City SkepticsPlay

Download our free app to listen on your phone

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Julia invites philosopher and blogger Dan Fincke onto the show, inspired by a productive disagreement they had on Facebook. Their topic in this episode: civility in public discourse. Do atheists and skeptics have a responsibility to be civil when expressing disagreement, and does that responsibility vary depending on who their target is? Is there a legitimate role for offensive satire? And might there be downsides to civility? Dan and Julia also revisit the subject of their original disagreement: the recent NECSS decision to rescind Richard Dawkins' speaking invitation, on account of a video he tweeted which compared feminists to Islamists. Dan and Julia attempt to put the Dawkins case study in the broader context of the civility debate, asking questions like: What makes something offensive, and can someone be *unjustifiably* offended?

More episodes from Rationally Speaking Podcast