Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Re-connecting the New Constitution to the Declaration of Independence.
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Re-connecting the New Constitution to the Declaration of Independence.
Re-connecting the New Constitution to the Declaration of Independence.
CLP News Network Episode for June 6, 2018.
Laurie Thomas Vass
The Citizens Liberty Party News Network clpnewsnetwork.com
Note to viewers. We believe that the ideological differences between socialists and conservatives are irreconcilable and that conservatives must prepare for what comes after the National civil dissolution. We advocate the state sovereignty framework of the Articles of Confederation, based upon a democratic republic of states.
This is the introduction of a much longer podcast, available at podbean. The other sections of the podcast include:
Section 1. Thomas Burke. Author of the Articles of Confederation.
Section 2. Madison’s Flawed Preamble.
Section 3. Strict Construction of the 3 Preambles.
Section 4. Interpreting the Purpose of Government Derived from the 3 Preambles.
Section 5. The Guiding Principles of the New National Government .
The full text and audio of the most recent podcast is available for free at clpnewsnetwork.com. The entire text and audio archive of all the CLP News Network podcasts are available for an annual subscription of $30.
Introduction.
In the natural rights individualist society, the role of government is to reduce the chance situations that other individuals, or the deep state agents, will deploy the police power of the state to override the individual citizen’s freedoms of choice in pursuing their sovereign life mission.
The government serves this function by administering the rule of law provided by the constitutional framework of collective decision-making, whose goal is to secure just outcomes to the laws that individuals give to themselves.
“No one is born into moral subjugation to political power,” stated Jefferson.
Jefferson wrote that when citizens leave the state of nature to create their government, “all men are created equal… in nature all humans are equal…not subject to the rightful authority of any other human being…in a state of nature no rightful authority exists in nature. No man is subjected to the will or authority of any other man,” he wrote, over and over again, from 1776, to the very last letter he wrote in 1826.
Jefferson believed that individuals are rights-possessors, with equal inalienable rights to pursue their own happiness, manage their private lives, and be free of government coercion in their person and their property.
Jefferson’s natural rights principles were:
Equality among citizens to participate in government.
Privacy of citizens from the invasions of agents of government.
The right to vote in free and fair elections.
The protection of the natural and property rights of individuals as the supreme goal of government.
Equal access to the courts and equality before the law.
Jefferson wrote the Declaration as a compact between citizens in each state to establish a rightful centralized political power, dedicated to protecting the natural rights of citizens that are left incompletely protected within each state government.
The adoption of the Declaration, in 1776, and the subsequent adoption Articles, in 1781, moved the citizens of the United States toward a constitutional egalitarian individualism, with an appeal to natural rights.
Jefferson’s constitutional arrangement, as expressed in the Articles, was based upon the common moral values in the Declaration.
Madison’s constitution was not.
Conclusion of Introduction.
We believe that the differences between Democrats and conservatives are irreconcilable and unresolvable, under the current Constitution.
On every single principle of a natural rights republic, the Democrats socialists have an alien, subversive, view of America.
Today, nothing binds the two factions together in a common national mission. The socialists will never voluntarily obey the unwritten American rule of law because they will never share the cultural belief that all persons, institutions, and entities are subject to the equal application of the la
View all episodes
By CLP News Network with Laurie Thomas VassRe-connecting the New Constitution to the Declaration of Independence.
CLP News Network Episode for June 6, 2018.
Laurie Thomas Vass
The Citizens Liberty Party News Network clpnewsnetwork.com
Note to viewers. We believe that the ideological differences between socialists and conservatives are irreconcilable and that conservatives must prepare for what comes after the National civil dissolution. We advocate the state sovereignty framework of the Articles of Confederation, based upon a democratic republic of states.
This is the introduction of a much longer podcast, available at podbean. The other sections of the podcast include:
Section 1. Thomas Burke. Author of the Articles of Confederation.
Section 2. Madison’s Flawed Preamble.
Section 3. Strict Construction of the 3 Preambles.
Section 4. Interpreting the Purpose of Government Derived from the 3 Preambles.
Section 5. The Guiding Principles of the New National Government .
The full text and audio of the most recent podcast is available for free at clpnewsnetwork.com. The entire text and audio archive of all the CLP News Network podcasts are available for an annual subscription of $30.
Introduction.
In the natural rights individualist society, the role of government is to reduce the chance situations that other individuals, or the deep state agents, will deploy the police power of the state to override the individual citizen’s freedoms of choice in pursuing their sovereign life mission.
The government serves this function by administering the rule of law provided by the constitutional framework of collective decision-making, whose goal is to secure just outcomes to the laws that individuals give to themselves.
“No one is born into moral subjugation to political power,” stated Jefferson.
Jefferson wrote that when citizens leave the state of nature to create their government, “all men are created equal… in nature all humans are equal…not subject to the rightful authority of any other human being…in a state of nature no rightful authority exists in nature. No man is subjected to the will or authority of any other man,” he wrote, over and over again, from 1776, to the very last letter he wrote in 1826.
Jefferson believed that individuals are rights-possessors, with equal inalienable rights to pursue their own happiness, manage their private lives, and be free of government coercion in their person and their property.
Jefferson’s natural rights principles were:
Equality among citizens to participate in government.
Privacy of citizens from the invasions of agents of government.
The right to vote in free and fair elections.
The protection of the natural and property rights of individuals as the supreme goal of government.
Equal access to the courts and equality before the law.
Jefferson wrote the Declaration as a compact between citizens in each state to establish a rightful centralized political power, dedicated to protecting the natural rights of citizens that are left incompletely protected within each state government.
The adoption of the Declaration, in 1776, and the subsequent adoption Articles, in 1781, moved the citizens of the United States toward a constitutional egalitarian individualism, with an appeal to natural rights.
Jefferson’s constitutional arrangement, as expressed in the Articles, was based upon the common moral values in the Declaration.
Madison’s constitution was not.
Conclusion of Introduction.
We believe that the differences between Democrats and conservatives are irreconcilable and unresolvable, under the current Constitution.
On every single principle of a natural rights republic, the Democrats socialists have an alien, subversive, view of America.
Today, nothing binds the two factions together in a common national mission. The socialists will never voluntarily obey the unwritten American rule of law because they will never share the cultural belief that all persons, institutions, and entities are subject to the equal application of the la