
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Reviews the Broden and Snellman theory of rectal prolapse as a progressive internal intussusception. The episode clarifies the misnomer of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome—where true ulcers only appear in 23% of cases—and outlines its precise operative indications. Crucially, it highlights registry data showing that perineal approaches (Altemeier, Delorme) carry a four-times greater relative mortality risk in frail elderly patients compared to minimally invasive abdominal rectopexy, upending decades of surgical dogma.
By Allen Kamrava, MD MBA FACS FASCRSReviews the Broden and Snellman theory of rectal prolapse as a progressive internal intussusception. The episode clarifies the misnomer of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome—where true ulcers only appear in 23% of cases—and outlines its precise operative indications. Crucially, it highlights registry data showing that perineal approaches (Altemeier, Delorme) carry a four-times greater relative mortality risk in frail elderly patients compared to minimally invasive abdominal rectopexy, upending decades of surgical dogma.