The panel will discuss what reforms Congress should or should not make to the administrative state. Topics will include the REINS Act, the position of independent agencies, and rules of deference to the administrative state, including Chevron and Auer. Panelists: Jack Beermann, Boston University School of Law Kathryn Kovacs, Rutgers Law School Michael Rappaport, University of San Diego School of Law Christopher Walker, Ohio State University College of Law Moderator: Emily Bremer, University of Wyoming School of Law

The panel will discuss what reforms Congress should or should not make to the administrative state. Topics will include the REINS Act, the position of independent agencies, and rules of deference to the administrative state, including Chevron and Auer.Panelists:Jack Beermann, Boston University School of LawKathryn Kovacs, Rutgers Law SchoolMichael Rappaport, University of San Diego School of LawChristopher Walker, Ohio State University College of LawModerator: Emily Bremer, University of Wyoming School of Law

The panel will discuss what reforms Congress should or should not make to the administrative state. Topics will include the REINS Act, the position of independent agencies, and rules of deference to the administrative state, including Chevron and Auer. Panelists: Jack Beermann, Boston University School of Law Kathryn Kovacs, Rutgers Law School Michael Rappaport, University of San Diego School of Law Christopher Walker, Ohio State University College of Law Moderator: Emily Bremer, University of Wyoming School of Law

Reform Proposals for the Administrative State

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. This podcast feed contains audio files of Federalist Society panel discussions, debates, addresses, and other events related to law and public policy. Additional audio and video can be found at <a href="https://fedsoc.org/commentary" rel="noopener">https://fedsoc.org/commentary</a>.

News

Politics

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. This podcast feed contains audio files of Federalist Society panel discussions, debates, addresses, and other events related to law and public policy. Additional audio and video can be found at https://fedsoc.org/commentary.

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. This podcast feed contains audio files of Federalist Society panel discussions, debates, addresses, and other events related to law and public policy. Additional audio and video can be found at <a href="https://fedsoc.org/commentary" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://fedsoc.org/commentary</a>.

Share Reform Proposals for the Administrative State

Sign up to save your podcasts

Reform Proposals for the Administrative State

Reform Proposals for the Administrative State

More shows like FedSoc Events

SCOTUScast

FedSoc Forums

Faculty Division Bookshelf

The Ben Shapiro Show

The History Network

The 365 Days of Astronomy

We the People

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

Necessary & Proper Podcast

Divided Argument