Defending and Commending the Faith With Dr. Joe L. Mott, inviting the atheist, agnostic and skeptic to examine for themselves the evidence for the Christian faith

Relativism’s Moral Argument Fails - Part 1


Listen Later

References:

(1) 3 rules of teaching.

(2) The meaning of moral relativism.

(3) Moral relativism is usually posed as a direct antithesis of moral objectivism/realism.

(4) William Lane Craig divides moral truths into moral values and objective duties.

(5) “Reasonable Faith” by William Lane Craig.

(6)The Bible is resplendent with moral statements.

(7) The Australian philosopher J. L. Mackie asserted, “There are no objective values.”

(8) The American anthropologist Ruth Benedict said, “There are no objective, universal ethical norms; there are only the habits we call our ethics.”

(9) Relativism’s Moral Argument I learned from C. Ben Mitchell’s book “Ethics and Moral Reasoning.”

(10) The US Military Academy philosopher Louis Pojman called the Diversity Thesis which affirms: “The notions of right and wrong differ from person to person and culture to culture.”The Dependency Thesis is the proposition, “Morality depends on some combination of human nature, the human condition, or human culture.”

(11) Any argument can be refuted by demonstrating some term is used ambiguously, some premise is false, or the argument involves a logical fallacy.

(12) Quote from Emanuel Swedenborg: “There are two loves from which all good and truth come: love of the Lord and love of the neighbor. And there are two loves from which all evils and falsities come: the love of self and the love of the world.”

This is episode 88.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Defending and Commending the Faith With Dr. Joe L. Mott, inviting the atheist, agnostic and skeptic to examine for themselves the evidence for the Christian faithBy Joe Mott

  • 2.6
  • 2.6
  • 2.6
  • 2.6
  • 2.6

2.6

5 ratings