
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Transcript:Republican Senator John Cornyn , Republican from Texas blew up at an NBC News crew that attempted to ask him a question on an apparent flip-flop in his views. Cornyn wrote an op-ed for the New York Post in which he claimed to support “whatever changes to Senate rules that may prove necessary for us to get the ‘SAVE America Act’ (passed) and homeland security funding.”Those changes may include ending the longstanding Senate filibuster tactic, he noted, ”or it could be a different reform.”The “SAVE America” legislation would require proof-of-citizenship to register and photo ID to vote in person or by mail. There would also be a requirement for states to check their voter rolls through a Department of Homeland Security database. The Cornyn New York Post op-ed marked a change from the Senator’s previous stance. He had a track record of staunch support for the filibuster and the Senate’s 60-vote threshold to pass most bills.“I spent years defending the filibuster because the 60-vote threshold was a net benefit to Texas and our nation,” Cornyn wrote in the Post. “Before moderate Democrats went extinct, the rules worked.” NBC News wanted Cornyn to amplify his new views. Their subsequent story speculated that the senator’s change of heart came because Cornyn needs President Donald Trump's endorsement to push him over the top in a competitive Republican runoff for his Senate seat. But he wasn’t in the mood to talk about it.“You previously said that nuking the filibuster would be taking a wrecking ball to Senate rules,” an NBC reporter asked. “Is that no longer true?”“Um, I said I’d be open to reforms,” Cornyn replied. :”What would you say to those who say you just changed your mind to win the president’s endorsement,” the reporter asked. “I’d say, uh, that’s not true,” Coryn said, adding, “I think we’re through. Go ahead. Go away.” The Senator then placed his hand over the NBC camera lens, ending the interview. Although the law varies in certain jurisdictions, placing your hand over a camera lens is is generally considered offensive touching. That can rise to the crime of battery or assault in some jurisdictions if it’s done without consent. Raw Story first reported the incident.Our Analysis:A Symphony of Hypocrisy: Senator Cornyn's Dance with the FilibusterSenator John Cornyn's , Republican from Texas recent outburst at an NBC News crew is less about the confrontation itself and more a glaring spotlight on the dramatic political gymnastics politicians will perform to cling to power. The Senator's flip-flop on the Senate filibuster rule isn't just a change of heart. it's a masterclass in political expediency over principle.Cornyn's op-ed in the New York Post is a veritable feast of contradictions. After years of staunch defense of the filibuster. a mechanism he once hailed as a protector of Texas and national interests. Cornyn now entertains the idea of scrapping or altering it. Why? To pass the "SAVE America Act," a piece of legislation that reads like a wishlist for those looking to impose more restrictive voting laws under the guise of security. The act requires proof of citizenship for registration and photo ID for voting, measures often criticized for their potential to disenfranchise voters, particularly those from marginalized communities.The Filibuster: A Convenient ShieldThe filibuster, requiring a 60-vote threshold to pass most bills, has been a contentious issue. Cornyn's past defense of it wasn't just a matter of principle but a tactical advantage, preserving the power to block legislation that didn't align with his or his party's views. His sudden pivot, suggesting a willingness to dismantle this tool, signals not an epiphany on governance but a raw pursuit of legislative wins. at any cost.The Political Calculus of Flip-FloppingThe NBC News crew's attempt to get Cornyn to explain his change of stance was met with evasion and hostility. ending with Cornyn physically blocking the camera. This isn't just about a politician refusing to answer questions. it's a vivid illustration of the lengths some will go to avoid accountability. The suggestion by NBC News that Cornyn's shift might be motivated by a desire for President Trump's endorsement for his Senate run adds another layer of intrigue. It paints a picture of a senator willing to sacrifice long-held beliefs on the altar of political expediency.The Assault on the PressCornyn's physical intervention. placing his hand over a camera lens. isn't just rude. it's an affront to press freedom. While the legal ramifications may vary, the act itself symbolizes a deeper issue: the growing disdain for media scrutiny among some political figures. This confrontation is emblematic of a broader, more disturbing trend of hostility towards the press, a fundamental pillar of democracy.Conclusion: The Cost of Political ExpediencySenator Cornyn's flip-flop on the filibuster and subsequent clash with NBC News is a microcosm of a larger problem in American politics: the willingness to abandon principle for power. It's a reminder that, for some, legislative victories and political endorsements are worth more than consistency or integrity. As voters and citizens, the responsibility falls on us to hold our elected officials accountable, demanding transparency and principle over opportunism. In a democracy, our voices. and our votes. are the ultimate checks on the abuses of those in power.s
By Paulo SantosTranscript:Republican Senator John Cornyn , Republican from Texas blew up at an NBC News crew that attempted to ask him a question on an apparent flip-flop in his views. Cornyn wrote an op-ed for the New York Post in which he claimed to support “whatever changes to Senate rules that may prove necessary for us to get the ‘SAVE America Act’ (passed) and homeland security funding.”Those changes may include ending the longstanding Senate filibuster tactic, he noted, ”or it could be a different reform.”The “SAVE America” legislation would require proof-of-citizenship to register and photo ID to vote in person or by mail. There would also be a requirement for states to check their voter rolls through a Department of Homeland Security database. The Cornyn New York Post op-ed marked a change from the Senator’s previous stance. He had a track record of staunch support for the filibuster and the Senate’s 60-vote threshold to pass most bills.“I spent years defending the filibuster because the 60-vote threshold was a net benefit to Texas and our nation,” Cornyn wrote in the Post. “Before moderate Democrats went extinct, the rules worked.” NBC News wanted Cornyn to amplify his new views. Their subsequent story speculated that the senator’s change of heart came because Cornyn needs President Donald Trump's endorsement to push him over the top in a competitive Republican runoff for his Senate seat. But he wasn’t in the mood to talk about it.“You previously said that nuking the filibuster would be taking a wrecking ball to Senate rules,” an NBC reporter asked. “Is that no longer true?”“Um, I said I’d be open to reforms,” Cornyn replied. :”What would you say to those who say you just changed your mind to win the president’s endorsement,” the reporter asked. “I’d say, uh, that’s not true,” Coryn said, adding, “I think we’re through. Go ahead. Go away.” The Senator then placed his hand over the NBC camera lens, ending the interview. Although the law varies in certain jurisdictions, placing your hand over a camera lens is is generally considered offensive touching. That can rise to the crime of battery or assault in some jurisdictions if it’s done without consent. Raw Story first reported the incident.Our Analysis:A Symphony of Hypocrisy: Senator Cornyn's Dance with the FilibusterSenator John Cornyn's , Republican from Texas recent outburst at an NBC News crew is less about the confrontation itself and more a glaring spotlight on the dramatic political gymnastics politicians will perform to cling to power. The Senator's flip-flop on the Senate filibuster rule isn't just a change of heart. it's a masterclass in political expediency over principle.Cornyn's op-ed in the New York Post is a veritable feast of contradictions. After years of staunch defense of the filibuster. a mechanism he once hailed as a protector of Texas and national interests. Cornyn now entertains the idea of scrapping or altering it. Why? To pass the "SAVE America Act," a piece of legislation that reads like a wishlist for those looking to impose more restrictive voting laws under the guise of security. The act requires proof of citizenship for registration and photo ID for voting, measures often criticized for their potential to disenfranchise voters, particularly those from marginalized communities.The Filibuster: A Convenient ShieldThe filibuster, requiring a 60-vote threshold to pass most bills, has been a contentious issue. Cornyn's past defense of it wasn't just a matter of principle but a tactical advantage, preserving the power to block legislation that didn't align with his or his party's views. His sudden pivot, suggesting a willingness to dismantle this tool, signals not an epiphany on governance but a raw pursuit of legislative wins. at any cost.The Political Calculus of Flip-FloppingThe NBC News crew's attempt to get Cornyn to explain his change of stance was met with evasion and hostility. ending with Cornyn physically blocking the camera. This isn't just about a politician refusing to answer questions. it's a vivid illustration of the lengths some will go to avoid accountability. The suggestion by NBC News that Cornyn's shift might be motivated by a desire for President Trump's endorsement for his Senate run adds another layer of intrigue. It paints a picture of a senator willing to sacrifice long-held beliefs on the altar of political expediency.The Assault on the PressCornyn's physical intervention. placing his hand over a camera lens. isn't just rude. it's an affront to press freedom. While the legal ramifications may vary, the act itself symbolizes a deeper issue: the growing disdain for media scrutiny among some political figures. This confrontation is emblematic of a broader, more disturbing trend of hostility towards the press, a fundamental pillar of democracy.Conclusion: The Cost of Political ExpediencySenator Cornyn's flip-flop on the filibuster and subsequent clash with NBC News is a microcosm of a larger problem in American politics: the willingness to abandon principle for power. It's a reminder that, for some, legislative victories and political endorsements are worth more than consistency or integrity. As voters and citizens, the responsibility falls on us to hold our elected officials accountable, demanding transparency and principle over opportunism. In a democracy, our voices. and our votes. are the ultimate checks on the abuses of those in power.s