References:

(1) “Natural Theology” by William Paley.

(2) Fine-tuning.

(3) “The Blind Watchmaker” by Richard Dawkins.

(4) “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins.

(5) If anyone makes a truth claim and does not offer evidence for that truth claim, then it is reduced to a mere opinion.

(6) “The Design Inference” by William Dembski.

(7) Dembski’s explanatory filter.

This is Episode 112.

References: (1) “Natural Theology” by William Paley. (2) Fine-tuning. (3) “The Blind Watchmaker” by Richard Dawkins. (4) “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins. (5) If anyone makes a truth claim and does not offer evidence for that truth claim, then it is reduced to a mere opinion. (6) “The Design Inference” by William Dembski. (7) Dembski’s explanatory filter. This is Episode 112.

References:

(1) “Natural Theology” by William Paley.

(2) Fine-tuning.

(3) “The Blind Watchmaker” by Richard Dawkins.

(4) “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins.

(5) If anyone makes a truth claim and does not offer evidence for that truth claim, then it is reduced to a mere opinion.

(6) “The Design Inference” by William Dembski.

(7) Dembski’s explanatory filter.

This is Episode 112.

Return to the Design Argument - Part 1

Dr. Joe Mott earned his PhD at LSU, and was a distinguished math professor at Florida State University for 38 years years, helping to write 3 math textbooks, and authoring over 30 research articles in math.

Religion & Spirituality

Christianity

Education

Defending and Commending the Faith With Dr. Joe L. Mott, inviting the atheist, agnostic and skeptic to examine for themselves the evidence for the Christian faith

Share Return to the Design Argument - Part 1

Sign up to save your podcasts

Return to the Design Argument - Part 1

Return to the Design Argument - Part 1