Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Revenge of the ‘Tacos’
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Revenge of the ‘Tacos’
Please consider donating using the form below to further advance the mission.
Church Militant (a 501(c)4 corporation) is responsible for the content of this commentary.
TRANSCRIPT
I'm Michael Voris, coming to you from Taco-land, at least according to Jill Biden. To the rest of Americans who aren't racist, it's just called Texas.
If you missed that little gem she let slip a few weeks back, here it is: As she tried to connect with Latin voters, she butchered their language and called them tacos. Even the really unelected Democrats can't seem to get out of their own way.
There is a horrible miscalculation that the Democrats — who really are racist — made about Latino voters. In a phrase, here it is: "They're all the same."
Democrats have strategized for decades that they will do next-to-nothing to stop the flow of illegal immigration. In the end, it will benefit them at the polls during elections.
The reasoning went something like this: "All these Mexicans are all the same, and the ones already here legally will welcome the illegals, because they're all just tacos at the end of the day."
It's nearly unavoidable. The truth comes out of the mouths of even evil people, the truth being that irresistible.
Just like Whites aren't all the same and Asians aren't all the same, Latinos are not all the same. But when your party leadership is flat-out racist, you see the world in racist terms.
After all, racist Nancy Pelosi just said it's wrong for Republican governors to send busloads and planeloads of illegal immigrants up North because — wait for it — they need to be down South, picking the crops.
The Democratic Party appeals to Latino voters are about as authentic as Robert O'Rourke, a fourth-generation Irish American, running around using a pet name given to him by his family to distinguish him from his grandfather.
Beto O'Rourke has about as much in common with Latino voters as Latinos have in common with "Bo-Guh-Das" — which is to say, nothing. His name is Robert. Period.
But the phony appeal by Democrats here in Texas to Latino voters does have some reasoning behind it. This year, for the first time ever, there are more Latinos in Texas than Whites — excluding Beto, of course.
That's why the eyes of the political world will be on Texas this election — to see exactly how the Latino vote breaks down. Democrats have longed for this moment and helped engineer it, but it might just blow up in their faces.
Latino voters are proving to be much more stubbornly conservative than Democrats had hoped.
Latino voters are proving to be much more stubbornly conservative than Democrats had hoped.
Roughly speaking, half are Catholics and the other half are some version of mostly conservative Evangelicals. This is a testament to the failure of bishops in the United States to keep the Latino population Catholic, but that's another story.
When large percentages of Latino voters meet face to face with wokeism, they run the other way.
They do not support open borders. They do not support abortion on demand. They do not support attacks on the family. They do not support the craziness in the schools with sexualization of their children.
Perhaps the most easily quantifiable way to measure this wokeism rejection is this: Marxists introduced a stupid word, the gender-neutral "Latinx," into the social lexicon. It's meant to destroy the difference between masculine and feminine in the Spanish language, with "o" for male and "a" for female at the end of words.
According to polls, a meager 3% of Latinos use the term, but even more have combined forces to have it dropped. They see it as insulting to their heritage, which it is.
The headline in an Axios article from earlier this year says it all: "Latino Groups Want to Do Away With Latinx." The article's lead sentence then nails it: "Elected officials, a major newspaper and the oldest Latino civil rights organization in the U.S. have all spoken out strongly in recent weeks against the continued use of 'Latinx.'"
As Axios noted, this reflects "a movement by some Latinos to define themselves rather than be labeled by predominantly white progressives."
Hey Jill, hey Nancy, hey Robert — are you listening? Talk about a bunch of White progressives. You'd be hard-pressed to find a more racist group. Cultural appropriation, insults and relegating the "breakfast tacos" to picking the crops.
All three of them have deep ties to the Catholic Church — not the Catholic faith, mind you, just the institutional aspect of the Church. They go to Mass at least somewhat regularly, receive Holy Communion when they do go and openly talk about their Faith as though they actually believed it.
Instead, they are racists who exploit whatever they need to remain in power. But with the Latino vote, they may have met their Waterloo here in the Lone Star State this election cycle.
With the Latino vote, they may have met their Waterloo here in the Lone Star State.
While California has a higher actual number of Latinos — 15 million, to 11 million in Texas — more than half of Texas is now Latino. This November, that means a sea change in American politics may sweep across the American political frontier. The Democrats may very well have only themselves to blame for it.
Church Militant will be in the Southwest for the next few days, looking at this specific angle — the impact of Catholic and conservative Latino voters on the country's political landscape. It's all part of our continuing commitment to you, to bring you what you won't hear practically any place else.
Please contribute whatever you might be able to our ongoing "Fighting for the Future" fundraising campaign. Yes, political coverage is a part of all of it. The link is right below.
What we do costs a lot of money, but we think you will agree that no one does it better than we do. Please support our continuing work here. Thank you in advance for your support and please just click on the link.
Before we leave Texas and continue on to Arizona to check out the political goings-on over there from a Catholic perspective, we're going to just scoot over to the closest "Bo-Guh-Da" and grab some breakfast tacos.
View all episodes
By Church Militant
4.7
325325 ratings
Please consider donating using the form below to further advance the mission.
Church Militant (a 501(c)4 corporation) is responsible for the content of this commentary.
TRANSCRIPT
I'm Michael Voris, coming to you from Taco-land, at least according to Jill Biden. To the rest of Americans who aren't racist, it's just called Texas.
If you missed that little gem she let slip a few weeks back, here it is: As she tried to connect with Latin voters, she butchered their language and called them tacos. Even the really unelected Democrats can't seem to get out of their own way.
There is a horrible miscalculation that the Democrats — who really are racist — made about Latino voters. In a phrase, here it is: "They're all the same."
Democrats have strategized for decades that they will do next-to-nothing to stop the flow of illegal immigration. In the end, it will benefit them at the polls during elections.
The reasoning went something like this: "All these Mexicans are all the same, and the ones already here legally will welcome the illegals, because they're all just tacos at the end of the day."
It's nearly unavoidable. The truth comes out of the mouths of even evil people, the truth being that irresistible.
Just like Whites aren't all the same and Asians aren't all the same, Latinos are not all the same. But when your party leadership is flat-out racist, you see the world in racist terms.
After all, racist Nancy Pelosi just said it's wrong for Republican governors to send busloads and planeloads of illegal immigrants up North because — wait for it — they need to be down South, picking the crops.
The Democratic Party appeals to Latino voters are about as authentic as Robert O'Rourke, a fourth-generation Irish American, running around using a pet name given to him by his family to distinguish him from his grandfather.
Beto O'Rourke has about as much in common with Latino voters as Latinos have in common with "Bo-Guh-Das" — which is to say, nothing. His name is Robert. Period.
But the phony appeal by Democrats here in Texas to Latino voters does have some reasoning behind it. This year, for the first time ever, there are more Latinos in Texas than Whites — excluding Beto, of course.
That's why the eyes of the political world will be on Texas this election — to see exactly how the Latino vote breaks down. Democrats have longed for this moment and helped engineer it, but it might just blow up in their faces.
Latino voters are proving to be much more stubbornly conservative than Democrats had hoped.
Latino voters are proving to be much more stubbornly conservative than Democrats had hoped.
Roughly speaking, half are Catholics and the other half are some version of mostly conservative Evangelicals. This is a testament to the failure of bishops in the United States to keep the Latino population Catholic, but that's another story.
When large percentages of Latino voters meet face to face with wokeism, they run the other way.
They do not support open borders. They do not support abortion on demand. They do not support attacks on the family. They do not support the craziness in the schools with sexualization of their children.
Perhaps the most easily quantifiable way to measure this wokeism rejection is this: Marxists introduced a stupid word, the gender-neutral "Latinx," into the social lexicon. It's meant to destroy the difference between masculine and feminine in the Spanish language, with "o" for male and "a" for female at the end of words.
According to polls, a meager 3% of Latinos use the term, but even more have combined forces to have it dropped. They see it as insulting to their heritage, which it is.
The headline in an Axios article from earlier this year says it all: "Latino Groups Want to Do Away With Latinx." The article's lead sentence then nails it: "Elected officials, a major newspaper and the oldest Latino civil rights organization in the U.S. have all spoken out strongly in recent weeks against the continued use of 'Latinx.'"
As Axios noted, this reflects "a movement by some Latinos to define themselves rather than be labeled by predominantly white progressives."
Hey Jill, hey Nancy, hey Robert — are you listening? Talk about a bunch of White progressives. You'd be hard-pressed to find a more racist group. Cultural appropriation, insults and relegating the "breakfast tacos" to picking the crops.
All three of them have deep ties to the Catholic Church — not the Catholic faith, mind you, just the institutional aspect of the Church. They go to Mass at least somewhat regularly, receive Holy Communion when they do go and openly talk about their Faith as though they actually believed it.
Instead, they are racists who exploit whatever they need to remain in power. But with the Latino vote, they may have met their Waterloo here in the Lone Star State this election cycle.
With the Latino vote, they may have met their Waterloo here in the Lone Star State.
While California has a higher actual number of Latinos — 15 million, to 11 million in Texas — more than half of Texas is now Latino. This November, that means a sea change in American politics may sweep across the American political frontier. The Democrats may very well have only themselves to blame for it.
Church Militant will be in the Southwest for the next few days, looking at this specific angle — the impact of Catholic and conservative Latino voters on the country's political landscape. It's all part of our continuing commitment to you, to bring you what you won't hear practically any place else.
Please contribute whatever you might be able to our ongoing "Fighting for the Future" fundraising campaign. Yes, political coverage is a part of all of it. The link is right below.
What we do costs a lot of money, but we think you will agree that no one does it better than we do. Please support our continuing work here. Thank you in advance for your support and please just click on the link.
Before we leave Texas and continue on to Arizona to check out the political goings-on over there from a Catholic perspective, we're going to just scoot over to the closest "Bo-Guh-Da" and grab some breakfast tacos.