Today we return to the kyle Rittenhouse case. I discuss why they dropped the misdemeanor gun  charge and we assess the incredibly weak closing argument made by Kyle's attorney Mark Richards. Where did he go wrong and what possible effects might it have on the outcome of the case?

Follow & Support To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

How to support the channel:

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.