
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Just like the political fervour that overtook Britain after the 23rd of June 2016, the litigation surrounding Brexit was jam-packed with controversy. This culminated in the second Miller case, decided on 24 September 2019, where the Supreme Court found then Prime Minister Johnson’s attempt to prorogue Parliament unlawful. The case brought about intense scrutiny surrounding the role of judges in our constitutional set-up. In this episode, Lüben sits down with Robert Craig, lecturer at the University of Bristol. They explore the Brexit cases and what they tell us about the UK’s ‘living’ constitution.
By Lüben RoussevJust like the political fervour that overtook Britain after the 23rd of June 2016, the litigation surrounding Brexit was jam-packed with controversy. This culminated in the second Miller case, decided on 24 September 2019, where the Supreme Court found then Prime Minister Johnson’s attempt to prorogue Parliament unlawful. The case brought about intense scrutiny surrounding the role of judges in our constitutional set-up. In this episode, Lüben sits down with Robert Craig, lecturer at the University of Bristol. They explore the Brexit cases and what they tell us about the UK’s ‘living’ constitution.