
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The U.S. Supreme Court may be the ultimate arbiter of constitutional questions, but recently its biggest decisions have been ones where the justices have refused to weigh in.
From the Chief Justice's refusal to preside over a second impeachment trial to the justices' dismissal of the "emoluments" litigation, Bloomberg Law's Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin explain the consequences of the court's inaction.
By Bloomberg Law3.9
155155 ratings
The U.S. Supreme Court may be the ultimate arbiter of constitutional questions, but recently its biggest decisions have been ones where the justices have refused to weigh in.
From the Chief Justice's refusal to preside over a second impeachment trial to the justices' dismissal of the "emoluments" litigation, Bloomberg Law's Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin explain the consequences of the court's inaction.

4,168 Listeners

4,386 Listeners

380 Listeners

32 Listeners

6,298 Listeners

113,069 Listeners

56,843 Listeners

113 Listeners

173 Listeners

6,130 Listeners

744 Listeners