
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The U.S. Supreme Court may be the ultimate arbiter of constitutional questions, but recently its biggest decisions have been ones where the justices have refused to weigh in.
From the Chief Justice's refusal to preside over a second impeachment trial to the justices' dismissal of the "emoluments" litigation, Bloomberg Law's Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin explain the consequences of the court's inaction.
By Bloomberg Law3.9
155155 ratings
The U.S. Supreme Court may be the ultimate arbiter of constitutional questions, but recently its biggest decisions have been ones where the justices have refused to weigh in.
From the Chief Justice's refusal to preside over a second impeachment trial to the justices' dismissal of the "emoluments" litigation, Bloomberg Law's Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin explain the consequences of the court's inaction.

4,239 Listeners

4,421 Listeners

380 Listeners

33 Listeners

6,312 Listeners

113,450 Listeners

56,968 Listeners

114 Listeners

173 Listeners

6,100 Listeners

746 Listeners