
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The U.S. Supreme Court may be the ultimate arbiter of constitutional questions, but recently its biggest decisions have been ones where the justices have refused to weigh in.
From the Chief Justice's refusal to preside over a second impeachment trial to the justices' dismissal of the "emoluments" litigation, Bloomberg Law's Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin explain the consequences of the court's inaction.
By Bloomberg Law3.9
155155 ratings
The U.S. Supreme Court may be the ultimate arbiter of constitutional questions, but recently its biggest decisions have been ones where the justices have refused to weigh in.
From the Chief Justice's refusal to preside over a second impeachment trial to the justices' dismissal of the "emoluments" litigation, Bloomberg Law's Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin explain the consequences of the court's inaction.

38,526 Listeners

9,187 Listeners

3,495 Listeners

374 Listeners

481 Listeners

683 Listeners

1,119 Listeners

32 Listeners

14,437 Listeners

112,394 Listeners

24,696 Listeners

113 Listeners

174 Listeners

5,761 Listeners

3,516 Listeners