Today the bros talk about a monumental, if flawed, effort to present a coherent argument against the idea that “Strong Ai” or the idea that consciousness arises solely from algorithmic processes (and that therefore the human brain is in essence a computer and the mind is a program). Does he succeed? Maybe. Probably not. But the process is very interesting.

Bibliography:

- Benjamin: The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction

Re: physicalism, qualia, individuated sentience, Einstein-brains

- J.R. Lucas: Minds Machines and Godel

- Searle: Minds Brains and Programs

Re: Chinese Room

-A Historical Overview of Ai Winters

Re: Framing effect, “Ai Effect”

-Newman and Nagel: "Gödel's Proof"

Re: mathematical incompleteness

-Wallace: Consider The Lobster, "Authority and American Usage"

Re: Constructing realities, being and consciousness

-Hegel: Example Of The Hegelian Dialectic"

Duality of being and nothing, dialectic processes, sublation

-Christian: Big History

Re: Watchmaker fallacy, God of Gaps, philosophy of knowledge

-Assefa: Tiling the Plane

Recent discovery of infinite non-periodic tiling shapes