Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share RULEMATCH Spot On - Delivering on Digital (Part 2)
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
RULEMATCH Spot On - Delivering on Digital (Part 2)
How do you lay the foundation for fully digital capital markets? How far has work actually come in integrating a central bank digital currency into efforts towards tokenization?
And how is Switzerland pushing the industry forward in the next evolution of financial markets?
In Part 2 of this RULEMATCH Spot On episode, Ian Simpson and David Newns, Head of the SIX Digital Exchange (SDX) discuss the different ways that Switzerland has played a leading role in the development of the digital assets industry globally - with the support of the Swiss National Bank and others and with close input from FINMA.
Episode show notes:
(1:57) - Project Helvetia and why “equivalence” is a victory for Switzerland
(5:59) - The evolution of banks’ capabilities with digital assets
(9:24) - How banks are opening their minds to new use cases
(10:38) - Growth in number of member banks on SDX
(11:50) - Banks building or offering custody services for digital assets
(13:02) - Details on custody setup on SDX
(14:12) - The chicken-egg topic of dealing with crypto and digital assets
(16:13) - Looking at SDX’s crypto custody services and repo services
(17:26) - How custody will enable crypto collateral mobilization from banks on SDX
(20:49) - Why collateral and lending with digital assets is critical in capital markets
(21:59) - Regulatory advancements (in Europe and Switzerland) and their implications
(23:51) - The significance of USDC/EURC MiCA approval
(24:42) - The challenges of DLT securities in Switzerland
(27:57) - Switzerland’s “central” role in global CBDC projects
(33:07) - Why Switzerland is still “winning the digital assets race”
(35:34) - A “sea change” in digital assets moving things forward
-----
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this podcast about RULEMATCH AG (“RULEMATCH”) and any guest company is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered exhaustive. They do not imply any elements of a contractual relationship nor any offering.
View all episodes
By RULEMATCHHow do you lay the foundation for fully digital capital markets? How far has work actually come in integrating a central bank digital currency into efforts towards tokenization?
And how is Switzerland pushing the industry forward in the next evolution of financial markets?
In Part 2 of this RULEMATCH Spot On episode, Ian Simpson and David Newns, Head of the SIX Digital Exchange (SDX) discuss the different ways that Switzerland has played a leading role in the development of the digital assets industry globally - with the support of the Swiss National Bank and others and with close input from FINMA.
Episode show notes:
(1:57) - Project Helvetia and why “equivalence” is a victory for Switzerland
(5:59) - The evolution of banks’ capabilities with digital assets
(9:24) - How banks are opening their minds to new use cases
(10:38) - Growth in number of member banks on SDX
(11:50) - Banks building or offering custody services for digital assets
(13:02) - Details on custody setup on SDX
(14:12) - The chicken-egg topic of dealing with crypto and digital assets
(16:13) - Looking at SDX’s crypto custody services and repo services
(17:26) - How custody will enable crypto collateral mobilization from banks on SDX
(20:49) - Why collateral and lending with digital assets is critical in capital markets
(21:59) - Regulatory advancements (in Europe and Switzerland) and their implications
(23:51) - The significance of USDC/EURC MiCA approval
(24:42) - The challenges of DLT securities in Switzerland
(27:57) - Switzerland’s “central” role in global CBDC projects
(33:07) - Why Switzerland is still “winning the digital assets race”
(35:34) - A “sea change” in digital assets moving things forward
-----
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this podcast about RULEMATCH AG (“RULEMATCH”) and any guest company is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered exhaustive. They do not imply any elements of a contractual relationship nor any offering.