Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Running for President In Order to Run From the Law
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Running for President In Order to Run From the Law
Episode 31. October 11, 2019.
CLP topic category. The Democrat’s Destruction of the Rule of Law.
Title: Running for President In Order to Run From the Law.
Introduction.
Our podcast today examines the logic of Schiff’s impeachment allegation that Trump “used a foreign government to investigate a political opponent.”
Schiff’s entire argument hinges on Biden’s candidacy as an opponent to Trump.
By running for President, Biden provided Schiff with an excuse to accuse President Trump of asking a foreign leader to investigate his opponent.
On October 3, 2019, Schiff stated,
“The president of the United States is encouraging a foreign nation to interfere again to help his campaign by investigating a rival is a fundamental breach of the presidential oath of office. It endangers our elections; it endangers our national security. It ought to be condemned by every member of this body, Democrats and Republicans alike. The president of the United States is suggesting — urging — a foreign country to interfere in our presidential elections…”
Both Democrats and Republicans echo this talking point link between Trump’s call and using Ukraine to undermine Biden’s candidacy.
Hillary Clinton believes that Trump asked Ukraine to influence the 2020 elections, tweeting
“The president asked a foreign power to help him win an election. Again.”
Susan Collins stated, on October 5, 2019,
“It is "completely inappropriate" for a president to encourage a foreign state to investigate a political rival.”
If Biden was not a candidate, then Schiff’s allegation would change to “Trump asked a foreign government to investigate its own internal corruption.”
Before Biden was a candidate, Trump’s inquiry into corruption in Ukraine would appear normal, as a precaution before giving Ukraine more military aid.
After Biden loses the nomination, and is no longer a candidate, Trump’s effort to root out corruption in Ukraine cannot be used by Schiff to accuse Trump of using a foreign government to investigate his opponent.
In other words, Schiff must hope that Biden remains a viable candidate long enough for Schiff’s Ukraine hoax to work to impeach Trump.
Biden must hope that Schiff continues making his allegation, so that Biden can continue to run for President, in order to run from the law.
This is similar to Hillary’s strategy of covering her criminal acts, after she got elected. Biden must continue to run for president to provide cover for his criminal acts.
Our podcast argues that Schiff’s impeachment effort is part of a bigger Democrat effort to destroy the American rule of law. The American rule of law is based upon equal application of the law to all citizens, who are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
When Pelosi repeats her talking point that Trump is not above the law, she is repeating part of principle of the American rule of law. The only people in Pelosi’s socialism that are above the rule of law are Hillary, Pelosi, and the other Democrat political elites in the deep state.
The rule of law is a constitutional agreement among citizens to voluntarily obey the civil rules and procedures of justice. Socialism is not a voluntary system, it is a coercive use of the police power to compel citizens to obey socialist law.
Our podcast argues that it is not simply hatred of Donald Trump that motivates Schiff. Schiff deeply believes in Obama’s vision of global socialism, and that vision was derailed by Trump’s victory.
The key actor in Schiff’s protection racket is Obama. The Democrats must shield Obama from criminal charges in order to have any prospect of implementing Obama’s global socialist vision.
Biden’s candidacy provides more time for Schiff and the deep state agents to cover up Obama’s corruption, until either Biden, or some other Democrat, can win in 2020, and end the investigation of Obama’s corruption.
Destruction of the rule of law means that Schiff must deny President Trump his 6th Amendment right to confront the whistleblower.
Trump’s 6th amendment right is superior to the whistleblower’s claim of anonymity.
Destruction of the rule of law means having the whistleblower testify from a remote location and obscuring the individual’s appearance. It means denying Republicans the right to cross-examine the witness or issue subpoenas to compel testimony.
This podcast concludes that the stark ideological divisions over the American rule of law between the Democrats and natural rights conservatives constitute the unimpeachable evidence that this current constitution failed to prevent tyranny.
In Madison’s conception of tyranny, the majority of Democrats in the House terrorize the minority of Republicans of their rights. Madison’s flaw left the citizens defenseless to protect their civil liberties and natural rights from the Jacobin socialists.
The citizens are now entirely dependent on William Barr to uphold the American rule of law.
The split between the Democrat’s vision of the rule of law, under socialism, and the American rule of law is irreconcilable and irrevocable.
The only non-violent solution to the split between the Democrats and conservatives is a civil dissolution of the current constitution, and the creation of a new constitution based upon the framework of state sovereignty, outlined in America’s first Constitution, The Articles of Confederation.
The right person to lead the new political movement is Lou Dobbs.
I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this is the copyrighted Citizen Liberty Party News Network podcast for October 11, 2019.
Our podcast today is under the CLP topic category The Democrat’s Destruction of the Rule of Law, and is titled, Running for President In Order to Run From the Law.
The most recent podcast of the CLP News Network is available for free. The entire text and audio archive of our podcasts are available for subscription of $30 per year, at the CLP News Network.com.
View all episodes
By CLP News Network with Laurie Thomas VassEpisode 31. October 11, 2019.
CLP topic category. The Democrat’s Destruction of the Rule of Law.
Title: Running for President In Order to Run From the Law.
Introduction.
Our podcast today examines the logic of Schiff’s impeachment allegation that Trump “used a foreign government to investigate a political opponent.”
Schiff’s entire argument hinges on Biden’s candidacy as an opponent to Trump.
By running for President, Biden provided Schiff with an excuse to accuse President Trump of asking a foreign leader to investigate his opponent.
On October 3, 2019, Schiff stated,
“The president of the United States is encouraging a foreign nation to interfere again to help his campaign by investigating a rival is a fundamental breach of the presidential oath of office. It endangers our elections; it endangers our national security. It ought to be condemned by every member of this body, Democrats and Republicans alike. The president of the United States is suggesting — urging — a foreign country to interfere in our presidential elections…”
Both Democrats and Republicans echo this talking point link between Trump’s call and using Ukraine to undermine Biden’s candidacy.
Hillary Clinton believes that Trump asked Ukraine to influence the 2020 elections, tweeting
“The president asked a foreign power to help him win an election. Again.”
Susan Collins stated, on October 5, 2019,
“It is "completely inappropriate" for a president to encourage a foreign state to investigate a political rival.”
If Biden was not a candidate, then Schiff’s allegation would change to “Trump asked a foreign government to investigate its own internal corruption.”
Before Biden was a candidate, Trump’s inquiry into corruption in Ukraine would appear normal, as a precaution before giving Ukraine more military aid.
After Biden loses the nomination, and is no longer a candidate, Trump’s effort to root out corruption in Ukraine cannot be used by Schiff to accuse Trump of using a foreign government to investigate his opponent.
In other words, Schiff must hope that Biden remains a viable candidate long enough for Schiff’s Ukraine hoax to work to impeach Trump.
Biden must hope that Schiff continues making his allegation, so that Biden can continue to run for President, in order to run from the law.
This is similar to Hillary’s strategy of covering her criminal acts, after she got elected. Biden must continue to run for president to provide cover for his criminal acts.
Our podcast argues that Schiff’s impeachment effort is part of a bigger Democrat effort to destroy the American rule of law. The American rule of law is based upon equal application of the law to all citizens, who are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
When Pelosi repeats her talking point that Trump is not above the law, she is repeating part of principle of the American rule of law. The only people in Pelosi’s socialism that are above the rule of law are Hillary, Pelosi, and the other Democrat political elites in the deep state.
The rule of law is a constitutional agreement among citizens to voluntarily obey the civil rules and procedures of justice. Socialism is not a voluntary system, it is a coercive use of the police power to compel citizens to obey socialist law.
Our podcast argues that it is not simply hatred of Donald Trump that motivates Schiff. Schiff deeply believes in Obama’s vision of global socialism, and that vision was derailed by Trump’s victory.
The key actor in Schiff’s protection racket is Obama. The Democrats must shield Obama from criminal charges in order to have any prospect of implementing Obama’s global socialist vision.
Biden’s candidacy provides more time for Schiff and the deep state agents to cover up Obama’s corruption, until either Biden, or some other Democrat, can win in 2020, and end the investigation of Obama’s corruption.
Destruction of the rule of law means that Schiff must deny President Trump his 6th Amendment right to confront the whistleblower.
Trump’s 6th amendment right is superior to the whistleblower’s claim of anonymity.
Destruction of the rule of law means having the whistleblower testify from a remote location and obscuring the individual’s appearance. It means denying Republicans the right to cross-examine the witness or issue subpoenas to compel testimony.
This podcast concludes that the stark ideological divisions over the American rule of law between the Democrats and natural rights conservatives constitute the unimpeachable evidence that this current constitution failed to prevent tyranny.
In Madison’s conception of tyranny, the majority of Democrats in the House terrorize the minority of Republicans of their rights. Madison’s flaw left the citizens defenseless to protect their civil liberties and natural rights from the Jacobin socialists.
The citizens are now entirely dependent on William Barr to uphold the American rule of law.
The split between the Democrat’s vision of the rule of law, under socialism, and the American rule of law is irreconcilable and irrevocable.
The only non-violent solution to the split between the Democrats and conservatives is a civil dissolution of the current constitution, and the creation of a new constitution based upon the framework of state sovereignty, outlined in America’s first Constitution, The Articles of Confederation.
The right person to lead the new political movement is Lou Dobbs.
I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this is the copyrighted Citizen Liberty Party News Network podcast for October 11, 2019.
Our podcast today is under the CLP topic category The Democrat’s Destruction of the Rule of Law, and is titled, Running for President In Order to Run From the Law.
The most recent podcast of the CLP News Network is available for free. The entire text and audio archive of our podcasts are available for subscription of $30 per year, at the CLP News Network.com.