
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This Deep Dive breaks down the legal correspondence from The Willis Law Group, PLLC to the Supreme Court of the State of New York regarding a request to consider a supplemental exhibit in the case of Toribio, et al. v. 1936 Bath v. Apazidis. The letter highlights the discovery of a 25th operative report, which is substantially identical to 24 others already submitted, yet includes a "Neurolysis of Adhesions" billing, despite no difference in content.
Support the show
By iFraud FoundationThis Deep Dive breaks down the legal correspondence from The Willis Law Group, PLLC to the Supreme Court of the State of New York regarding a request to consider a supplemental exhibit in the case of Toribio, et al. v. 1936 Bath v. Apazidis. The letter highlights the discovery of a 25th operative report, which is substantially identical to 24 others already submitted, yet includes a "Neurolysis of Adhesions" billing, despite no difference in content.
Support the show