
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This Deep Dive takes a look at an Affirmation in Opposition and its supporting exhibits, from a New York Supreme Court case, Chantel McLaurin v. Andrew Walcott, et al. The affirmation, filed by Plaintiff's counsel, Frank Melendez, Esq., challenges Defendant Walcott's motion to disqualify Plaintiff's counsel, citing an alleged conflict of interest stemming from unsubstantiated RICO allegations against the firm and Plaintiff. Additionally, the affirmation opposes Defendant's request for a change of venue based on counsel's marriage to a judge.
What did the court decide? Let's dive in.
Support the show
By iFraud FoundationThis Deep Dive takes a look at an Affirmation in Opposition and its supporting exhibits, from a New York Supreme Court case, Chantel McLaurin v. Andrew Walcott, et al. The affirmation, filed by Plaintiff's counsel, Frank Melendez, Esq., challenges Defendant Walcott's motion to disqualify Plaintiff's counsel, citing an alleged conflict of interest stemming from unsubstantiated RICO allegations against the firm and Plaintiff. Additionally, the affirmation opposes Defendant's request for a change of venue based on counsel's marriage to a judge.
What did the court decide? Let's dive in.
Support the show