
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This podcast dives in the controversial claim of 21,000-23,000-year-old human footprints found at White Sands National Park. The source presents arguments questioning the dating methodology, which relies heavily on the potentially unreliable radiocarbon dating of rupia plants. A geoarchaeologist interviewed in the video highlights concerns about the lack of supporting archaeological evidence, such as tools or settlements, to corroborate such an ancient human presence. The debate centers on whether the evidence truly supports the claim of significantly pushing back the timeline of human arrival in the Americas, or if alternative explanations and methodological flaws are being overlooked. The source concludes by emphasizing the need for further research and a balanced consideration of all available evidence.
Read more
This podcast dives in the controversial claim of 21,000-23,000-year-old human footprints found at White Sands National Park. The source presents arguments questioning the dating methodology, which relies heavily on the potentially unreliable radiocarbon dating of rupia plants. A geoarchaeologist interviewed in the video highlights concerns about the lack of supporting archaeological evidence, such as tools or settlements, to corroborate such an ancient human presence. The debate centers on whether the evidence truly supports the claim of significantly pushing back the timeline of human arrival in the Americas, or if alternative explanations and methodological flaws are being overlooked. The source concludes by emphasizing the need for further research and a balanced consideration of all available evidence.
Read more