
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today we look at the reply affirmation submitted by Daniel Johnston defendants’ counsel in the case of Moreno v. Key Food, seeking to dismiss the lawsuit or amend their legal response. The defendants allege that the plaintiff committed fraud upon the court by providing perjured testimony regarding his criminal history, employment record, and medical treatment. Supporting evidence includes surveillance footage suggesting the accident was staged and medical records that show unnecessary surgeries were recommended almost immediately. Counsel argues that the plaintiff failed to provide any sworn factual rebuttal or medical affidavits to dispute these serious allegations of dishonesty and litigation misconduct. Ultimately, the defense contends that the plaintiff’s actions undermine the integrity of the judicial process, justifying either a total dismissal or the inclusion of fraud-based counterclaims.
Let's Dive In!
Support the show
By iFraud FoundationToday we look at the reply affirmation submitted by Daniel Johnston defendants’ counsel in the case of Moreno v. Key Food, seeking to dismiss the lawsuit or amend their legal response. The defendants allege that the plaintiff committed fraud upon the court by providing perjured testimony regarding his criminal history, employment record, and medical treatment. Supporting evidence includes surveillance footage suggesting the accident was staged and medical records that show unnecessary surgeries were recommended almost immediately. Counsel argues that the plaintiff failed to provide any sworn factual rebuttal or medical affidavits to dispute these serious allegations of dishonesty and litigation misconduct. Ultimately, the defense contends that the plaintiff’s actions undermine the integrity of the judicial process, justifying either a total dismissal or the inclusion of fraud-based counterclaims.
Let's Dive In!
Support the show