A recent board meeting contained an important topic that deserves our attention. As most people know, East Noble has had a spate of high-profile bad outcomes with some of its professional staff.

This episode is the second in a series on the reaction of board members towards a suggestion to confidentially share resumes of applicants with board members so they can cast an informed vote.  

Left-voting legacy board member Jen Blackman “lashes out” with manipulative reframing rather than having a professional discussion of the merits of the proposal. When that didn’t work then she told us all about how she influences votes based on scoping out applicant social media posts - which in reality can only be based upon her own personal values and preferences since she lacks any professional artifacts. Given her body language, reactions and faces she makes toward Christians and conservatives at board meetings, this begs the question; what are her personal biases?

 Manipulation tactics have been systematically used by our board and superintendent to influence public opinion for years as a means to escape taking appropriate decisive leadership decisions. This episode contains some good examples which can be used to train your ear to listen for it.

Parents, grandparents and citizens; there is little else that is more important than guarding our children from harmful people and destructive ideologies. Many teachers are taught and certified by very woke universities. Our board has passed woke-friendly policies, supported woke-friendly books, and recently they approved DEI containing curriculum. And it turns out, we have indeed made some poor hiring and management decisions after all.