Many of us have worked around (occasionally for) leaders who fall from grace, either due to personal misconduct, embarrassing the organization, or something else above and beyond mere poor performance. The leader becomes a pariah. Sometimes that fallen leader did things that made a lasting positive difference in the organization, and the accomplishments may be worth retaining and retelling. Unfortunately because of the leader's sullied reputation, the accomplishments may be discounted, ignored, or even repudiated. Is the appropriate? Are there times when we should separate the person from their deeds?