
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Today I continue a series on the topic of Christian Nationalism, specifically responding to common challenges to it. One of those challenges is: Won't Christian rulers enforce laws against blasphemy and heresy? Shouldn't we avoid that risk by not having Christian lawmakers or a Christian nation? In response to this, I will look at an 1824 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case titled Updegraph v. Commonwealth. The decision handed down by that court stands as one of the best summary defenses of blasphemy laws.
As always, if you have any law/government related questions, feel free to email me at [email protected], and I will be happy to address them on the program. Thank you and God bless!
Follow me on Facebook or Twitter or go to http://www.ericluppold.com/
Please support me on Patreon!
4.8
2020 ratings
Today I continue a series on the topic of Christian Nationalism, specifically responding to common challenges to it. One of those challenges is: Won't Christian rulers enforce laws against blasphemy and heresy? Shouldn't we avoid that risk by not having Christian lawmakers or a Christian nation? In response to this, I will look at an 1824 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case titled Updegraph v. Commonwealth. The decision handed down by that court stands as one of the best summary defenses of blasphemy laws.
As always, if you have any law/government related questions, feel free to email me at [email protected], and I will be happy to address them on the program. Thank you and God bless!
Follow me on Facebook or Twitter or go to http://www.ericluppold.com/
Please support me on Patreon!
15,844 Listeners
998 Listeners
1,938 Listeners
153,294 Listeners
20,205 Listeners
27,929 Listeners
1,002 Listeners
3,545 Listeners
934 Listeners
221 Listeners
6 Listeners
3,502 Listeners
34 Listeners
15,520 Listeners