
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Today I am finally able to walk through the 1824 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling Updegraph v. Commonwealth. This court decision, just a few pages long, serves (in my humble opinion) as one of the best arguments in support of blasphemy laws.
The judge who rendered the decision, Justice Duncan, argues both that Christianity is part of the common law of Pennsylvania and that the U.S. Constitution does not negate that reality. He looks at both English and American legal history to substantiate his argument.
As always, if you have any questions or comments, please email me at [email protected].
You can follow also me on Facebook or Twitter, or go to http://www.ericluppold.com/
And if you would like to support the show, please consider becoming a patron!
4.8
2020 ratings
Today I am finally able to walk through the 1824 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling Updegraph v. Commonwealth. This court decision, just a few pages long, serves (in my humble opinion) as one of the best arguments in support of blasphemy laws.
The judge who rendered the decision, Justice Duncan, argues both that Christianity is part of the common law of Pennsylvania and that the U.S. Constitution does not negate that reality. He looks at both English and American legal history to substantiate his argument.
As always, if you have any questions or comments, please email me at [email protected].
You can follow also me on Facebook or Twitter, or go to http://www.ericluppold.com/
And if you would like to support the show, please consider becoming a patron!
15,846 Listeners
993 Listeners
1,938 Listeners
153,308 Listeners
20,209 Listeners
27,936 Listeners
1,002 Listeners
3,547 Listeners
935 Listeners
221 Listeners
6 Listeners
3,505 Listeners
34 Listeners
15,511 Listeners