
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today I am finally able to walk through the 1824 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling Updegraph v. Commonwealth. This court decision, just a few pages long, serves (in my humble opinion) as one of the best arguments in support of blasphemy laws.
The judge who rendered the decision, Justice Duncan, argues both that Christianity is part of the common law of Pennsylvania and that the U.S. Constitution does not negate that reality. He looks at both English and American legal history to substantiate his argument.
As always, if you have any questions or comments, please email me at [email protected].
You can follow also me on Facebook or Twitter, or go to http://www.ericluppold.com/
And if you would like to support the show, please consider becoming a patron!
By Governed by God4.8
2222 ratings
Today I am finally able to walk through the 1824 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling Updegraph v. Commonwealth. This court decision, just a few pages long, serves (in my humble opinion) as one of the best arguments in support of blasphemy laws.
The judge who rendered the decision, Justice Duncan, argues both that Christianity is part of the common law of Pennsylvania and that the U.S. Constitution does not negate that reality. He looks at both English and American legal history to substantiate his argument.
As always, if you have any questions or comments, please email me at [email protected].
You can follow also me on Facebook or Twitter, or go to http://www.ericluppold.com/
And if you would like to support the show, please consider becoming a patron!

228,901 Listeners

1,949 Listeners

21,139 Listeners

1,390 Listeners

45,515 Listeners

6 Listeners

1,185 Listeners

16,983 Listeners