Humans everywhere who are aware of the current state of affairs are observers of those enacting articulations.  All our previous generations also have been the observers of the ever-reenacting articulations.  Yet, it was R. Buckminster Fuller (1895-1983) in his lifetime of astutely focused observations who said, “The articulations are ever reenacted each time hoping to reduce the tolerance magnitude of the residual inaccuracy of observation or articulation.”  How does any observer hope to consciously reduce the tolerance magnitude of the residual inaccuracies without first clarifying a definition of these two words, ‘tolerance’ and ‘magnitude’ and with what these words may be synonymous?

From Oxford University Press Dictionary and Thesaurus, the noun magnitude means great size, extent, or importance.  Astronomically the brightness of a star represented by a number on a logarithmic scale is the magnitude of it.   Magnitude can be the relative size or extent, which is a number assigned to the ratio of two quantities of the same order in magnitude if one is less than 10 times as large as the other. 

So, the relative importance can be a problem of the first magnitude but most importantly is that magnitude relates to size and indicates that a potential conceptuality of timeless, sizeless systems may well correlate to reducing the tolerance magnitudes of the residual inaccuracies that otherwise tend to increase the tolerance as more people become increasingly tolerant of the residual errors in the universal communications process.  Humans can directly and inadvertently refer their thought and language correlatively to actions, reactions, and resultant adaptations to the sizes of manifest forms.

Relevant links will be provided. You can read the entire transcript on my website sagesynergeticage.com. Synergetics Eligion Experiential Experimental Education Complex, SEEEEC