<p>In this episode we consider the material bridging pp. 66-67 of Dr. Wilson's book, "Augustine's Conversion ...." It's a natural continuation from Episode 6, since we now look in more detail at Origen's Commentary on Romans, Book 4, Chapter 5, sections 1 and 3.  We will also briefly consider Scheck's comments.</p>

In this episode we consider the material bridging pp. 66-67 of Dr. Wilson's book, "Augustine's Conversion ...." It's a natural continuation from Episode 6, since we now look in more detail at Origen's Commentary on Romans, Book 4, Chapter 5, sections 1 and 3. We will also briefly consider Scheck's comments.

<p>In this episode we consider the material bridging pp. 66-67 of Dr. Wilson's book, "Augustine's Conversion ...." It's a natural continuation from Episode 6, since we now look in more detail at Origen's Commentary on Romans, Book 4, Chapter 5, sections 1 and 3. &nbsp;We will also briefly consider Scheck's comments.</p>

"Scheck concludes without warrant ... Quite the contrary" - Response to Ken Wilson

Dan Chapa and Turretinfan debate Theology while remaining friends. We share a foundation in the essentials of the Christian faith and a love of God and His word. Here, we will dive deep into the Bible and present both Calvinism/Arminianism and the precise points of disagreement. Hopefully the contrast will bring clarity for you. Welcome to Conversations in Calvinism!

Share "Scheck concludes without warrant ... Quite the contrary" - Response to Ken Wilson

Sign up to save your podcasts

"Scheck concludes without warrant ... Quite the contrary" - Response to Ken Wilson

"Scheck concludes without warrant ... Quite the contrary" - Response to Ken Wilson