
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Radiocarbon dating is increasingly distrusted within the scientific community unless it is verified by an independent secondary method. For instance, a mammoth bone tool originally dated at 25,000 to 32,000 years old was later re-tested using a nuclear accelerator and dated to just 2,000 years. This frequent margin of error demonstrates that carbon dating cannot disprove the historical timeline of the Bible.
Image: Jacques Cinq-Mars at Blue Caves dig, Yukon, Ruth M. Gotthardt, CC BY 4.0, Wikimedia Commons.
For more creation resources, visit https://creationmoments.com
By Creation MomentsRadiocarbon dating is increasingly distrusted within the scientific community unless it is verified by an independent secondary method. For instance, a mammoth bone tool originally dated at 25,000 to 32,000 years old was later re-tested using a nuclear accelerator and dated to just 2,000 years. This frequent margin of error demonstrates that carbon dating cannot disprove the historical timeline of the Bible.
Image: Jacques Cinq-Mars at Blue Caves dig, Yukon, Ruth M. Gotthardt, CC BY 4.0, Wikimedia Commons.
For more creation resources, visit https://creationmoments.com