Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share SCOTUS releases The Immuntiy Decision: What it means and implications
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
SCOTUS releases The Immuntiy Decision: What it means and implications
Click here to reply to @Phil
"That's because the vice president frequently serves as one of the president's closest advisors. So these private conversations would not be able to be used as evidence. Now, some people are remarking back to the Nixon tapes, and if the Nixon, if that whole Watergate system thing happened again tomorrow, those tapes would not be able to be admissible into the court as evidence. And then there was one more caveat to this, and Justice Roberts wrote that quote."
"That's because the vice president frequently serves as one of the president's closest advisors. So these private conversations would not be able to be used as evidence. Now, some people are remarking back to the Nixon tapes, and if the Nixon, if that whole Watergate system thing happened again tomorrow, those tapes would not be able to be admissible into the court as evidence. And then there was one more caveat to this, and Justice Roberts wrote that quote."
View all episodes
By swellcast.com/PhilClick here to reply to @Phil
"That's because the vice president frequently serves as one of the president's closest advisors. So these private conversations would not be able to be used as evidence. Now, some people are remarking back to the Nixon tapes, and if the Nixon, if that whole Watergate system thing happened again tomorrow, those tapes would not be able to be admissible into the court as evidence. And then there was one more caveat to this, and Justice Roberts wrote that quote."
"That's because the vice president frequently serves as one of the president's closest advisors. So these private conversations would not be able to be used as evidence. Now, some people are remarking back to the Nixon tapes, and if the Nixon, if that whole Watergate system thing happened again tomorrow, those tapes would not be able to be admissible into the court as evidence. And then there was one more caveat to this, and Justice Roberts wrote that quote."