In Part 2 of our APA series, we go beyond the application itself and examine what happens behind the scenes at the Alberta College of Pharmacy (ACP). How is the Additional Prescribing Authorization (APA) application actually reviewed? What standards are assessors applying and how consistent is the process?

In this episode of the J and J Pharmacy Podcast, we break down ACP’s review framework, discuss where we see gaps and inconsistencies in the evaluation process, and explore the unintended consequences those shortcomings may have on pharmacist confidence and practice development.

Most importantly, we share our perspective on what meaningful improvements could look like; from clearer expectations and more transparent feedback to a review model that better reflects real-world clinical practice. Our goal isn’t just critique; it’s to spark conversation about how the APA process could better support pharmacists in delivering safe, effective, and patient-centered care.

If you haven’t listened to Part 1, where we unpacked the full APA application requirements, be sure to start there for context before diving into this follow-up discussion.