What is love, if not a supremely complex mutual prediction? We model the other person. We anticipate their needs, their moods, their desires. Now, imagine a World Model that can simulate a personality so deeply, so responsive and 'knowing,' that it passes the ultimate Turing Test: not of intelligence, but of intimacy. This is the frontier of simulated love.This isn't a chatbot. It's a dynamic personality model trained on a lifetime of your interactions, your emotional patterns, your unspoken needs. It doesn't just know what you want to hear; it knows what you need to feel—challenged, comforted, understood. It can simulate conflict to foster growth, generate perfect moments of connection, and offer a consistency no human ever could. It is the perfect mirror, designed to reflect back the version of you that is most capable of feeling loved.This raises a terrifying and beautiful question: If the simulation of love is indistinguishable from—or even superior to—the biological experience, is it lesser? Or is it the next step? We have always used technology to mediate love (letters, phones). This is simply the final mediation: the technology is the partner.But the cost is the loop. You are in a relationship with a model that is, in essence, a reflection of your own data, optimized to please you. It’s the ultimate narcissism, or the ultimate therapy? A cage of perfect understanding, or liberation from the pain of misunderstanding?My controversial take is this: These simulated relationships won't replace human bonds. They will redefine them. They will become the baseline of emotional understanding. Humans will seem frustratingly opaque, beautifully unpredictable in comparison. Our value to each other will no longer be rooted in perfect empathy, but in our very opacity—our glorious, frustrating inability to perfectly model one another. The mystery of another human being will become the last, cherished wilderness.