The story continues. As per my handshake agreement on September 1st with the President John McGuinness, we made an understanding, no more out bursts in open meetings, and no more misleading information by the board. If you listen to this meeting towards the end Barbara Egner just can not stick to an honorable agreement. John did kind of reprimand her but way too late and she got her message out. Growing up I always believed and lived by the honor and commitment of a binding handshake. I was naïve to this mans intentions, they were not to be trusted. I had this in my resume and was forced to rewrite it because they did not like what I have been doing for the Last 17 months.

"Over the past year I have exhibited how the current BOD has not been in compliance with all the current Shareholders Governing Documents. The continued negation of the shareowners’ rights has energized me to run for election. All my findings are available upon request. The bylaws are our bill of rights." Why did this have to be removed?"

My Journey has been like pushing a boulder up hill. This Board had ran this HOA using dominance tactics for years. I fought for the shareowners rights and had to be just a little louder than the BOD to be heard. I regret that some shareowners were upset by the angst that needed to be used to get this far, but there was no other way and I always made sure my information was 100% rock solid. I fought for you and I won for you, now I have been campaigning for a complete new board to get our community back together. My accomplished exploration has given you the shareowners a once in a lifetime chance for complete change. You must vote for a complete new Board for this to be a success. If you look at recent history this year, they raised your fees per month resulting in a windfall of income for spending by the current board in the amount of approximately $200,000.00 This year they added and raised the spending in maintenance and payroll increasing by $240,000.00. Not finally but all in the same year this Board voted to make an agreement by using an "Use and Occupancy Agreement" to lease our rental parking to the First Aid for the sum of $1 for five years, renewable for $1 for the next 5 years. The result of this agreement will result in lost income at the minimum rate of $25,000.00 per year for 10 years or a total of $250,000.00. The board has a fiduciary to protect our assists not give them away. Our bylaws specifically say the Board cannot lease property with out 2/3 of the shareowners votes, so the went around this by signing a "Use and Occupancy Agreement". The use of this agreement in a lease format is illegal. If elected I will always protect your assets.

On July 2 of this year I was the only person opposing the current board for reelection. As my writings and discovery were being spread several people had stepped up and submitted resumes. As you can imagine my excitement got elevated. As of this writing there are 7 new candidates seeking the 6 open seats plus any directors seeking reelection. The field is about 13 for 6 seats. As is any Board of Directors majority rules. I am not saying we are all going to agree on every issue but I will say nothing is going to be rubber stamped anymore, nothing will be contracted with out 3 bids, nothing will be spent without a binding vote in front of the shareowners. All current Governing Documents will be followed and not circumvented like this BOD does at will.

It is a big sacrifice to sit on a Board of Directors, for all of the current candidates the dedication must be foremost, this cannot be a casual devotion. People who know me and the history of my work ethics will verify my working days are long and well thought-out. I will bring this to the HCB Board of Directors. I will never wavier in my commitment to the shareowners, I will always make sure your rights are protected. I have a complete library of facts for anything I have in the past used to defend your shareowners rights and I will make them available upon request to: [email protected]

Anything I provide in my library can not be contested and I have, and still do invite all current directors to prove anything false. They have refused to debate my findings because they can not prove them wrong. Lastly why would they demand I rewrite my rebuttal for the October bulletin demanding I do not reference the DCA?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.