
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Can we use the Sgarbossa Criteria? Below you’ll find what’s most likely (and hopefully) the silliest, catchiest and nerdiest talk on this topic recorded at the ECG masterclass from SWEETS2019. In it, Jonathan Ilicki, Alex Szeps and Elena Sgarbossa delve into how we best assess these patients. Here, first, is a bit more detail.
The Sgarbossa Criteria are three ECG rules that were developed by Dr Sgarbossa in 1996:
3 or more points has been shown to be highly specific (98%) for ACS in patients with LBBB[1]. Life on the Fast Lane has a great ECG database with a page about the Sgarbossa criteria.
There is limited research (key articles below[2–7]), but what has been published to date indicates the criteria are very specific, but not sensitive for ACS in patients with VPR[8] (open access here).
Amal Mattu has a great ECG resource called ECG Weekly. Here is an episode where he discusses using the Sgarbossa Criteria for Ventricular Paced Rhythm.
Interestingly, the Smith-modified Sgarbossa Criteria have recently been shown to have superior sensitivity and specificity to the original criteria[9]. It wasn’t included in the presentation as it’s tricky to fit the phrase “Smith-modified Sgarbossa Criteria” into a song…
Dr Smith is an ECG wizard (and also a really nice guy) and has a great blog entirely focused on how to get better at assessing ECGs. Here are a couple of posts on assessing for ACS/ACO in ECGs with VPR:
By The Talks | scanFOAMCan we use the Sgarbossa Criteria? Below you’ll find what’s most likely (and hopefully) the silliest, catchiest and nerdiest talk on this topic recorded at the ECG masterclass from SWEETS2019. In it, Jonathan Ilicki, Alex Szeps and Elena Sgarbossa delve into how we best assess these patients. Here, first, is a bit more detail.
The Sgarbossa Criteria are three ECG rules that were developed by Dr Sgarbossa in 1996:
3 or more points has been shown to be highly specific (98%) for ACS in patients with LBBB[1]. Life on the Fast Lane has a great ECG database with a page about the Sgarbossa criteria.
There is limited research (key articles below[2–7]), but what has been published to date indicates the criteria are very specific, but not sensitive for ACS in patients with VPR[8] (open access here).
Amal Mattu has a great ECG resource called ECG Weekly. Here is an episode where he discusses using the Sgarbossa Criteria for Ventricular Paced Rhythm.
Interestingly, the Smith-modified Sgarbossa Criteria have recently been shown to have superior sensitivity and specificity to the original criteria[9]. It wasn’t included in the presentation as it’s tricky to fit the phrase “Smith-modified Sgarbossa Criteria” into a song…
Dr Smith is an ECG wizard (and also a really nice guy) and has a great blog entirely focused on how to get better at assessing ECGs. Here are a couple of posts on assessing for ACS/ACO in ECGs with VPR: