
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Shifting-Goalposts-I.mp3
[Intro]
[Verse 1]
[Chorus]
[Bridge]
[Verse 2]
[Chorus]
[Bridge]
[Chorus]
[Outro]
A SCIENCE NOTE
If emissions stay high, we will permanently lock in warming beyond 1.5°C.
The real danger is that if we delay action, crossing 1.5°C even temporarily triggers irreversible climate feedbacks, making it impossible to return to safer levels.
Some political and economic interests may reframe the target as unachievable, shifting focus to “keeping below 2°C” instead.
Others may push for “overshoot and return” scenarios, where we exceed 1.5°C but later try to bring temperatures back down with carbon removal technologies.
The Paris 1.5°C target was never a strict “red line” but a long-term guideline.
Since 2024 has already passed that threshold in annual temperatures, the debate now shifts to whether this is temporary or permanent.
The more we delay cutting emissions, the more 1.5°C becomes truly impossible, moving us toward a 2°C+ world with severe consequences.
Shifting-Goalposts-I.mp3
[Intro]
[Verse 1]
[Chorus]
[Bridge]
[Verse 2]
[Chorus]
[Bridge]
[Chorus]
[Outro]
A SCIENCE NOTE
If emissions stay high, we will permanently lock in warming beyond 1.5°C.
The real danger is that if we delay action, crossing 1.5°C even temporarily triggers irreversible climate feedbacks, making it impossible to return to safer levels.
Some political and economic interests may reframe the target as unachievable, shifting focus to “keeping below 2°C” instead.
Others may push for “overshoot and return” scenarios, where we exceed 1.5°C but later try to bring temperatures back down with carbon removal technologies.
The Paris 1.5°C target was never a strict “red line” but a long-term guideline.
Since 2024 has already passed that threshold in annual temperatures, the debate now shifts to whether this is temporary or permanent.
The more we delay cutting emissions, the more 1.5°C becomes truly impossible, moving us toward a 2°C+ world with severe consequences.