Heard at Heritage

Should the Press Be Restrained? Re-examining Libel Laws


Listen Later

America’s Founders understood the press as both a necessary component of republican government and a potential threat to political liberty. They counted on libel laws to restrain the press’s natural excesses. But the Supreme Court dramatically changed the nature of libel law in its landmark 1964 decision, New York Times v. Sullivan. How has this ruling changed the character of America’s press, and what have been long term consequences of this ruling? Should this decision be revisited? Please join us as our panel of experts consider whether stronger libel laws against the press should be revived.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Heard at HeritageBy Heritage Podcast Network

  • 4.6
  • 4.6
  • 4.6
  • 4.6
  • 4.6

4.6

37 ratings


More shows like Heard at Heritage

View all
EconTalk by Russ Roberts

EconTalk

4,270 Listeners

The Rest Is History by Goalhanger

The Rest Is History

15,506 Listeners