Whether we're talking about Taiwan, Ukraine or Cuba, strategic ambiguity is a political stance with its upsides and downsides.  After a discussion of the Shanghai COVID lockdown with Amy Hao, Michael Olsen asks the team and the audience whether the US should remain ambiguous regarding the independence of Taiwan.

Whether we're talking about Taiwan, Ukraine or Cuba, strategic ambiguity is a political stance with its upsides and downsides. After a discussion of the Shanghai COVID lockdown with Amy Hao, Michael Olsen asks the team and the audience whether the US should remain ambiguous regarding the independence of Taiwan.

Whether we're talking about Taiwan, Ukraine or Cuba, strategic ambiguity is a political stance with its upsides and downsides.&nbsp; After a discussion of the Shanghai COVID lockdown with Amy Hao, Michael Olsen asks the team and the audience whether the US should remain ambiguous regarding the independence of Taiwan.

Should The US Remain Strategically “Ambiguous”?

Pealing back a layer in geopolitics, searching through the lessons of history, comparing and contrasting culture, and reading between the lines of "great power competition", China Watch Radio delves into the past, present and future of US/China relations while balancing a critical eye for humanitarian abuses and authoritarian structures with a genuine hope for our shared humanity.

Share Should The US Remain Strategically “Ambiguous”?

Sign up to save your podcasts

Should The US Remain Strategically “Ambiguous”?

Should The US Remain Strategically “Ambiguous”?