
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Like E. Y. Mullins before him, W. T. Conner nuances the traditional understanding of original sin and total depravity. Conner - while describing children with the label “sinner” - refrains from teaching inborn guilt for Adam’s sin, arguing that slavery to sin’s evil forces and the natural human inclination toward sin more closely mirror Scripture’s explanation of mankind’s sinful heredity.
By Noah R. HuntLike E. Y. Mullins before him, W. T. Conner nuances the traditional understanding of original sin and total depravity. Conner - while describing children with the label “sinner” - refrains from teaching inborn guilt for Adam’s sin, arguing that slavery to sin’s evil forces and the natural human inclination toward sin more closely mirror Scripture’s explanation of mankind’s sinful heredity.