Episode Summary

In this third-to-last Explore episode, Nick and Jamie examine John's stated purpose for writing his gospel before diving into the strange epilogue of chapter 21. They wrestle with why John 20:30-31 sounds like a perfect ending yet an entire chapter follows, exploring three theories about when and why the epilogue was added. The conversation then shifts to Peter's apparent defeat as he returns to fishing, sparking a vulnerable discussion about seasons of waiting, calling, and purposelessness. They examine how Jesus deliberately uses a charcoal fire to trigger Peter's memory of denial as preparation for restoration, discuss the balance between studying scripture versus letting it pierce your soul, and explore why Jesus partners with our work without depending on it. The episode culminates in examining how the disciples recognized Jesus through multiple senses beyond visual identification, leading to personal stories about recognizing Jesus's presence through burning hearts and physical sensations today.

Key Points:

• John's gospel was written not merely for information but to give life and encourage faith. We must approach scripture both as students seeking understanding and as seekers allowing God's word to pierce our souls and transform us.

• The epilogue addresses Peter's restoration to ministry, showing how Jesus deals with total failure. Though the disciples had been commissioned and received the Spirit, they feel lost and purposeless, not knowing their next steps.

• Jesus doesn't wait for Peter to overcome his shame. Instead, he tracks Peter down in his dejection, demonstrating that camping out under humiliation is unhealthy. Jesus comes to convince us he hasn't given up on us.

• The charcoal fire is a deliberate sensory trigger. Jesus layers this experience so Peter will remember his denial before they even discuss it. Jesus doesn't let us avoid our failures but helps us face them squarely so they can be healed and we can move forward.

• Jesus partners with our work without depending on it. He invites our contribution (the disciples' fish) while already providing what's needed (fish cooking on the fire). We offer our 2% and Jesus expands it, but our failure doesn't derail his plans.

• Recognition of Jesus required more than visual identification. The disciples needed the beloved disciple's insight, the miraculous catch, and Jesus serving them to know it was him. We too recognize Jesus through burning hearts, spiritual awareness, and his work around us.

• The church needs both Peters (passionate, action-oriented) and Johns (perceptive, contemplative). Mature faith accepts that others follow Jesus differently without disparaging their path or feeling threatened by diversity in discipleship.

• Link shared in podcast: ⁠⁠The Bible Explored: Can I Trust the Bible?⁠⁠

Discussion Questions:

• How do you balance studying the Bible for understanding with reading it devotionally so it can pierce your soul? Have you experienced both approaches, and how do they differ for you?

• Have you experienced "hurry up and wait" seasons where you feel called to something but don't know what to do next? How did you handle the purposelessness or frustration during that time?

• When shame or failure makes it hard to face Jesus, what keeps you from turning toward him? How does knowing that Jesus comes looking for us rather than waiting for us to get ourselves together change your perspective?

• Why do you think mature believers can accept diversity in how people follow Jesus while others struggle with it? What insecurities or fears might drive us to disparage different approaches to discipleship?

• Jesus invites our contribution without needing it, which means we can serve without angst or Messiah complexes. How does this balance between partnership and trust affect how you approach ministry or sharing your faith?

Connect With Us

• Email: [email protected]
• Social Media: @GoTheWildWay
• Website: thewildway.ca
• DONATE TO THE WILD WAY⁠.