
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday in fights over laws in Florida and Texas that seek to stop social media platforms from censoring conservative speech online.
At issue are provisions that require platforms to keep up certain kinds of content and inform users when posts are removed.
The justices are being asked to decide if those requirements are constitutional under the First Amendment’s right to editorial judgment.
Scott Wilkens, senior counsel at Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute, joins Cases and Controversies to discuss how the justices are likely to approach a case that could impact public discourse online for decades to come.
Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.
By Bloomberg Law3.9
155155 ratings
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday in fights over laws in Florida and Texas that seek to stop social media platforms from censoring conservative speech online.
At issue are provisions that require platforms to keep up certain kinds of content and inform users when posts are removed.
The justices are being asked to decide if those requirements are constitutional under the First Amendment’s right to editorial judgment.
Scott Wilkens, senior counsel at Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute, joins Cases and Controversies to discuss how the justices are likely to approach a case that could impact public discourse online for decades to come.
Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

38,614 Listeners

9,244 Listeners

3,571 Listeners

383 Listeners

487 Listeners

664 Listeners

1,105 Listeners

32 Listeners

14,449 Listeners

112,842 Listeners

24,822 Listeners

114 Listeners

173 Listeners

5,821 Listeners

3,508 Listeners