In this case, the Board of Appeal had to decide whether the shifting from a distributed gaming system to a more centralised architecture involves an inventive step. Here are the practical takeaways from the decision <a href="https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t170683eu1.html">T 0683/17</a> of 3.12.2020 of Technical Board of Appeal 3.4.03.

In this case, the Board of Appeal had to decide whether the shifting from a distributed gaming system to a more centralised architecture involves an inventive step. Here are the practical takeaways from the decision T 0683/17 of 3.12.2020 of Technical Board of Appeal 3.4.03.

In this case, the Board of Appeal had to decide whether the shifting from a distributed gaming system to a more centralised architecture involves an inventive step. Here are the practical takeaways from the decision <a href="https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t170683eu1.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">T 0683/17</a> of 3.12.2020&nbsp;of Technical Board of Appeal 3.4.03.

Software patent shortcast: T 0683/17

Patents, AI, and the future of attorney practice.

Share Software patent shortcast: T 0683/17

Sign up to save your podcasts

Software patent shortcast: T 0683/17

Software patent shortcast: T 0683/17

More shows like The Best Practice

INSIGHT epi - The podcast for European patent professionals