STARVIS 2 isn't just a spec upgrade. Sony's IMX676 rewrites the rules for
low-light, NIR, and HDR performance — but the IMX412 still wins in specific
scenarios. Here's how to choose.

In this episode of Vision Vitals, e-con Systems' embedded vision experts
compare the Sony IMX412 (STARVIS) and Sony IMX676 (STARVIS 2) across every
dimension system designers care about — pixel architecture, frame rate, HDR
modes, lens compatibility, and multi-camera sync — so you can make the right
sensor decision for your application.

What you'll learn:
☑️ STARVIS vs STARVIS 2 — what the architecture difference actually means
☑️ Pixel size: 1.55μm (IMX412) vs 2.0μm (IMX676) — the low-light tradeoff
☑️ When IMX412 wins: 240fps at 1080p, broader lens compatibility, dedicated low-power mode
☑️ When IMX676 wins: Superior NIR response, monochrome option (3–4x light sensitivity), 3-frame DOL HDR
☑️ HDR modes compared: 2-frame vs 3-frame DOL, and Clear HDR for fast-motion scenes
☑️ Optical format differences and what they mean for lens selection
☑️ Multi-camera synchronization on both sensors

Whether you're designing a machine vision system, industrial inspection camera,
medical imaging device, or autonomous vehicle platform — this episode gives you the sensor selection framework to get it right.

🔗 Explore e-con Systems' Sony sensor camera lineup